Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 43

Thread: Measure beam profiles?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Orlando, FL
    Posts
    1,090

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by shrad View Post
    I'm just wondering... is it possible to calculate divergence with only a beam profile, or as I think it is needed to move the laser or the camera for that?

    in the same approach, I have some linear CCD arrays I would like to use as sensors for some basic grating wavemeters like monochromators and the like... does anybody know if some easy ways of interfacing them already exist?
    I have a box of those for a project that never took off. I was going to sample the data and dump it to serial/USB and read it into an app that measures and allows calibration (thusly replacing the need for a $2000 spectrometer).

    Perhaps we can open up the cork on this in a new thread if a patent is not protecting that methodology?

    --DDL
    I suffer from the Dunning–Kruger effect... daily.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    84

    Default

    Steve,

    Do you think it is possible to use a camera with PAL resolution together with the VBeam demo though the program only uses 640x480?

    It says:
    "Full calculations are performed on all images. Maximum resolution is limited to 640x480 and the report generators are disabled."

    I hope this means it is possible to see all the results and calculations made, though you canīt get a report of them.

    Shrad,

    I asume it would be possible to calculate the divergence by measuring the beam diameter at one point and then move the camera a distance and make a new measurement.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    84

    Default

    DDL,

    A ccd spectrum analyzer, this is something I would like to build also, but it is unfortunately a bit too complicated for me. W has an interesting description on his pages:
    http://pagesperso-orange.fr/redlum.x...ratingOSA.html

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Vezon, Belgium
    Posts
    1,017

    Default

    yes indeed, but the movement needs to be well known to get reliable measurements, so if it is a professional software, I guess the solution is elsewhere... but I may be wrong

    if I happen to make something out of python and a webcam, no doubt I'll share my results

    I'll move to my new house the 27 of september, and as soon as I have unpacked everything, I start working on lasers related stuff again

  5. #15
    mixedgas's Avatar
    mixedgas is offline Creaky Old Award Winning Bastard Technologist
    Infinitus Excellentia Ion Laser Dominatus
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    A lab with some dripping water on the floor.
    Posts
    10,016

    Default

    1, you dont have to move the camera that accurately, +/- 1 mm in length is easy enough with a piece of plumbing pipe etc and the software handles centration.

    My bet is the software will truncate PAL, as will most cheap frame grabbers to make windows happy. I dont have my frame grabber set up here to try it.

    Spectrum is easy with a good digital camera, many people have done it with just a slit, a grating and a good camera lens.

    I've posted links before.

    Steve
    Qui habet Christos, habet Vitam!
    I should have rented the space under my name for advertising.
    When I still could have...

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    315

    Default

    A practical technique I have used in the past, which only requires a power meter is:

    Set up a horizontal bench some distance away from the source, so that the power meter is vertically centered on the beam. Slide the power meter along the bench in 1cm increments, taking a measurement each time to form a 1D profile. If you want to calculate the divergence, you have to repeat this at a second distance from the source.

    If your beam has modest divergence, you can get a good result with one profile 10m from the source and another profile 20m from the source. If your beam has lower divergence or you don't have that much space available, you can use a telescope.

    Of course a true 2D beam profiler will give you more information about the beam, but what are you going to do with this information? Probably assume a symmetrical gaussian profile to perform conventional fitting and modeling steps anyway. I used this technique on horrible multi-mode beams without any problem. Here is my result:


  7. #17
    mixedgas's Avatar
    mixedgas is offline Creaky Old Award Winning Bastard Technologist
    Infinitus Excellentia Ion Laser Dominatus
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    A lab with some dripping water on the floor.
    Posts
    10,016

    Default

    http://www.sbf1.sbfisica.org.br/proc...endido/c60.pdf

    http://www.bme.vanderbilt.edu/bme286.../knifeEdge.PDF


    http://www.uslasercorp.com/envoy/diverge.html

    now just decide if you want to use 10-90 or 80-20 or 19-82 as your cutoffs

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beam_diameter

    or the good old Divergence = 2arctan(Df-Di/2l)

    there are other ways with pinholes, slits, lenses.....

    remember, you should measure at the beam waist and at a point on the far field side.

    Steve
    Qui habet Christos, habet Vitam!
    I should have rented the space under my name for advertising.
    When I still could have...

  8. #18
    mixedgas's Avatar
    mixedgas is offline Creaky Old Award Winning Bastard Technologist
    Infinitus Excellentia Ion Laser Dominatus
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    A lab with some dripping water on the floor.
    Posts
    10,016

    Default

    Other then a bit of math, why is this such rocket science???

    http://www.sbf1.sbfisica.org.br/proc...endido/c60.pdf

    http://www.bme.vanderbilt.edu/bme286.../knifeEdge.PDF


    http://www.uslasercorp.com/envoy/diverge.html

    now just decide if you want to use 10-90 or 80-20 or 19-82 as your cutoffs

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beam_diameter

    or the good old Divergence = 2arctan(Df-Di/2l)

    there are other ways with pinholes, slits, lenses.....

    remember, you should measure at the beam waist and at a point on the far field side.

    In two weeks I'll have access to my library and can scan in:

    2. Simple Beam Propagation Measurements on Ion Lasers, SPIE Vol. 1414 Laser Beam Diagnostics, 1991. Its Spectra Physics way of doing it.

    Steve[/QUOTE]
    Qui habet Christos, habet Vitam!
    I should have rented the space under my name for advertising.
    When I still could have...

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Cupertino, California
    Posts
    2,130

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by krazer View Post
    Try contacting LaserBen on this forum, he has beam profiler he may be willing to let go for not way more than a decent CCD camera.
    I do have a pretty high res (2048 pixel) beam profiler setup with ND filter holder and breadboard mount for $300 shipped. It hooks right up to an oscilloscope and gives a clean reading of the beam profile with actual measurable results.
    CLICKY!!!

    Admin: In the immortal words of Captain Planet: YOU HAVE THE POWER
    Admin: (To quit being a bitch)

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Romania, Bucharest
    Posts
    32

    Default

    I use this for my IR beams:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KIizzSHFHEQ

    On a unaligned YAG (but still aligned enough to get a small output) it allows me to see exactly which way I need to turn the mirrors.

    Works really nice, but it's not exactly cheap.
    Last edited by Daedronus; 09-23-2009 at 01:06.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •