(..Cut/Paste continuum from the 'users online thread...)
..so, I'll prolly get slapped with a dead mackerel later for thisbut...
MicroPoll: How many *registered* users do you think we'd 'lose', if, say, the *ahem* Forum Owner were to 'divide' the Forum into a 'Free' section - where there was 'general info' / chit-chat / the 'Lounge' - and of course, any/all Safety / Regs info- but, then, a 'Paid-Members Only' section, where most of the 'meat and potatoes' was.. and, by 'Paid' I'm talking, like $10.00 / month, something very, very reasonable...
..I mean, yes, I know there are a few generous 'Corporate Subscribers', here, and many others (..like, Yours, Truly..that do stuff like, 'give-back', ie: 10% or more on PL-listed sales, and/or 'random donations' etc...
..But, say, we had even only-150 of those '300', as 'Paid-Only Members', @ a paltry $10. a Mo - only $120 bux per-annum....that's $18K a year, and - all due respect - correct me if I am wrong, but I don't think Herr Janitor is seeing that many scooby-snax from this site - - and he *should be*.
..If we could get 200, or, even 250 in the 'Paid-Only Members'-section, well, now, that's something, But, even $30K / yr. is a *very modest* amount for the founder of this Amazing Resource to be 'getting back'.. (..since, don't forget, there *are* hard-cost monthly expenses, to keep PL running, not just 'admin-time'...)
Yeah, 'charging' might squelch many's desire to come-in / join, and, yeah, there are some / Students, etc, for-whom, maybe even $10. a Month might be too-much... Ok, fine - have a 'Student Membership'-level: $5.00 / Mo. - and - come-on - even a Student spends more than $5.00 a month on chewing gum / cigs / pot / booze, soda, etc'Standard Member'-level: $10.00 / Month; 'Pro / Sho Co. Member': I dunno, $15.00 / mo.? Whatever, but it *should be* more... I'll be first in line, ok?
![]()
..And - no - those that 'pay more' have absolutely no more 'weight', or, 'rights' in here, than a 'basic member' - someone, even, say, paying $100. a month, could just as easily get Clü x 4'd, as the '1MW / pulse LaZor Pist0l' guy..if they up and start trying to top the record for @$$hattery...
Too, I do-subscribe to the 'information should-be free' philosophy, and, Yes - there are those Members, here, that do *not* commercially-gain off of PL, in any-way - they're purely-here for the 'interest' in the science /craft, etc - But, I say: "..So what??" I mean, we're not talking about putting the Admin in a Lamborghini, ok?....This post is purely about what is *fair* for what we - as the entire PL-community - all currently registered members - are getting from PL, vs giving back to it's Creator - apart-from - what we 'give back', informationally / help-wise, etc...
Thoughts? Refinements? Counter-points?Those that are behind this, I think we should start a 'petition'.
I mean, there are those that are making some pretty-healthy incomes off-PL, either directly, or, 'indirectly', thru networking and such, and while there are some, that - sure - prolly give $100. / mo. - or more -
I'd still be willing to bet that, overall, the Founder of this site is not seeing anything remotely-close to $18K / yr. let-alone, more.. which, IMHO, He *should be*...
MicroPoll Topic 2: I also have some specific-ideas for how we could 'smartly-integrate' a few, select, non-conflicting Advertisers, which, I know, is 'fundamentally stinky' to the Founder -and I concur, on most-points - but, what, really, would be the 'harm' in asking mega-bux Co's, like: Edmund Optics, Thorlabs, Newport, McMaster-Carr, one of the 'big catalog electronics-houses', ie: Mouser or equiv. etc.. from being 'Corp Sponsors' at a $G or more, a year? They're not likely to start 'spamming threads' - they're much too 'big' to spend time mucking with spam...
..Conversely, imo - as-advertisers: NO Chinese Laser Co's, NO Show-Co's, here within PL, SORRY Pango, et al - no ads for u, either -..this is to avoid 'conflicts of interest' / spam-wars / info-wrestling, etc - And - what-if, ie: some well-paying advertiser, *fails to deliver* or becomes crooked?? Does that advertiser not get 'called-out' for their failures to the community, because they're paying-in big-bux to PL?? ..You see the 'conundrum', here, with allowing advertising, *at all*, yes?
![]()
..But, again, I'd submit - a few, select, non-conflicted advertisers: Edmund Optics, Thorlabs, Newport, McMaster-Carr, Digikey / Mouser, etc - that's *it*... Thoughts?
Discuss...
ciao
j
PS - I wanna *stress* - I intend for this to be a discussion, *not* a 'community-slam' / criticism of anybody, K? - Just, some 'food for thought', in my usual-overpunctuated style...![]()