Page 10 of 18 FirstFirst ... 67891011121314 ... LastLast
Results 91 to 100 of 172

Thread: Another project red?

  1. #91
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Vezon, Belgium
    Posts
    1,017

    Default

    you have to take plano-convex lenses with focal lengths with the same ratio as the telescope (for example a 3X telescope will need a 3cm focal length and a 1cm focal length) and superpose the focal points, basically

    (correct me guys if I'm wrong here)

  2. #92
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Nottingham, UK
    Posts
    2,850

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hobbybob View Post
    What is, by approximation, the distance needed between the lenses for a nice result ?
    Try this:
    http://webphysics.davidson.edu/physl...ics_bench.html

    Use nominal figures. e.g. Add a beam, add a convex lens X=1.00, fl=3.00, add another concave lens, X=3.00, fl=-1.00.
    You could use two convex lenses, but overall telescope length would be increased. e.g. X=5.00, fl=1.00

    Dan
    - There is no such word as "can't" -
    - 60% of the time it works every time -

  3. #93
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    1,473

    Default

    Thanks Dan, excellent link which allowed me to play with the lenses.
    But does this really mean if i come in at 6 mm diameter i can bring it down to 2mm with very little divergence using a 3:1 telescope ?
    Sounds too good to be true...
    I didn't fail !
    I just found out 10,000 ways that didn't work.

  4. #94
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Nottingham, UK
    Posts
    2,850

    Default

    Divergence increases as diameter decreases by same factor. Steve (MixedGas) posted the technical description for this (and whether which way round worked or not - can't remember). Also can't remember the thread...
    - There is no such word as "can't" -
    - 60% of the time it works every time -

  5. #95
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Orlando, FL
    Posts
    1,090

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hobbybob View Post
    @DDL: any info on the PBSes and drivers ?
    PBS: Transmission/reflection losses, for what colors etc ?
    Drivers: positive / negative drivers ? Max. drive current ?

    looking forward seeing more info on them. Cool addition to your shop !
    They are now on the site and available.

    I've measured the PBS's to have <5% loss. I've got PBS's for 405, blue, and red. They measure 0.5".

    The drivers are positive, and will supply up to 400mA with full analog modulation. I've used these drivers and am very pleased with the results. The price is not bad at all either

    --DDL
    I suffer from the Dunning–Kruger effect... daily.

  6. #96
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Orlando, FL
    Posts
    1,090

    Default

    I want to add another one to the mix... another lens that is...

    http://www.thorlabs.com/thorProduct....mber=C110TME-B

    What do you guys think?

    --DDL
    I suffer from the Dunning–Kruger effect... daily.

  7. #97
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    veenwouden
    Posts
    2,580

    Default

    If anyone is looking for a driver have a look at the bottom of this PDF:

    http://www.versatis.nl/download/Shortform%20catalog.pdf

    It,s an 8 diode drver with 2 amps per driver on one board. Its easy to miss so scroll slowly :-)

    I tried to contact the company but i didn,t hear from them yet. Hopefully someone here want to pick it up from here and get a price from them. The company is B&Wtec


    info@bwtek.com www.bwtek.com

  8. #98
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Herts, UK
    Posts
    1,254

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by daedal View Post
    I want to add another one to the mix... another lens that is...

    http://www.thorlabs.com/thorProduct....mber=C110TME-B

    What do you guys think?

    --DDL
    I tried to read the blurb but my eyes kept darting back to the £60 GBP price tag and started watering profusely

  9. #99
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    veenwouden
    Posts
    2,580

    Default

    As the search goes on for the perfect lens maybe this is something:

    http://www.egismos.com/support/laser...O1-CO-6Mv2.pdf


    Specifications(typical@tc=25℃)
    Item. symbol O1-CO-6.5-8.9-M O1-CO-6.3-9.8-M
    Material Glass (OHARA L-TIM28) Glass (OHARA L-BAL42)
    Operating Wavelength λ 600~810nm 630~850nm
    Numerical Aperture NA 0.29 0.17
    Effective Focal Length EFL 8.9mm 9.8mm
    Working Distance
    (Back Focal Length)
    WD
    BFL 7.55mm 8.25mm
    Collimated Beam Size ≤6mm at 10m ≤8mm at 10m
    Collimated Beam Divergence 0.2~0.3mrad ≤0.3mrad
    Wave Front Error ≤0.05λ (635nm) ≤0.04λ (780nm)
    Outer Diameter OD (φ) 6.50mm 0/-0.03mm 6.35mm±0.02mm
    Clear Aperture
    (Effective Diameter) CA 5.2mm (R1)3.5mm (R1)
    R1 Φ5.2mm / R2 Φ4.6mm R1 Φ3.5mm / R2 Φ3.0mm

    Center Thickness CT 2.36mm±0.03mm 3.00mm±0.02mm
    Transmission (AR Coating) Tr ≥97%(635nm) ≥97% (650nm,780nm)
    Operating Temperature -40℃ to +160 ℃ -40 ℃to +160 ℃
    Storage Temperature -60 ℃to +200 ℃ -60 ℃to +200 ℃
    Surface Quality
    (Mill Standard) 60/40 60/40

  10. #100
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Northern Indiana
    Posts
    921

    Default

    Update on my combiner project.

    FU*K! how many diodes can a person kill in one day? Finally got the mounts machined for the 8 diode test combiner. Only have 4 diodes at the moment. That's cool, i will just put them on the four "corners". Put 2 in to get started then go ahead and ground the chassis with a high side driver. Doh!! now i only have 2 diodes to work with.

    Good news is the 4-40 screws have enough resolution to aim and overlap the beams at a distance. The initial idea seems to work. Now I only need to make a small change to the mirror holders to allow more movement in the +X direction. pictures coming soon.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •