Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 35

Thread: 400mw 640 vs 1W 650?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    East Sussex, England
    Posts
    5,248

    Default 400mw 640 vs 1W 650?

    Ok, so as the title says, which is better/brighter?

    640nm @ 400mW
    650nm @ 1000mW

    Chroma has the 650 ahead on luminous flux, but I'm hearing conflicting stories about how they look in real life.

    Even better, anyone got any pics of similar ratios of 640/650 they can post?

    Thanks

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Central Florida
    Posts
    7,067

    Wink

    Quote Originally Posted by norty303 View Post

    Even better, anyone got any pics of similar ratios of 640/650 they can post?
    Dammit man!!! I clicked on this thinking you were doing the comparisson and had the pics already...
    Love, peace, and grease,

    allthat... aka: aaron@pangolin

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Orlando, FL
    Posts
    1,090

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by norty303 View Post
    Ok, so as the title says, which is better/brighter?

    640nm @ 400mW
    650nm @ 1000mW

    Chroma has the 650 ahead on luminous flux, but I'm hearing conflicting stories about how they look in real life.

    Even better, anyone got any pics of similar ratios of 640/650 they can post?

    Thanks
    Well... as you mentioned, our own fantastic Chroma tool shows the following
    1W 650 @ 73.081 lm
    0.4W 640 @ 47.81 lm

    Although, is this going to be a purchased 650? or a DIY 658?

    I have a 200mW 640 and a 500mW 658 that I can compare... if interested...

    --DDL

    P.S. 1W of 658nm = 46.9681lm
    I suffer from the Dunning–Kruger effect... daily.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    East Sussex, England
    Posts
    5,248

    Default

    Looking at your signature pic, you've got 300mw of 532 and 640. How do they balance up?

    The reason I'm asking is I have a RGY with ~400mW 532 and 1.1W of 650. I'm looking to build a partner projector using 400-500mW of 532 and wondered whether to go with ~900mW of 650 or ~400mW of 640

    Although, is this going to be a purchased 650? or a DIY 658?
    This'll be a Laserwave module, although I'm aware they're not doing more than 350mW of 640 at the moment (it'll probably still be knocking on 400mW I'd expect)
    The 1.1w is a LW module I got off Marc

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Amsterdam, NL
    Posts
    2,098

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by norty303 View Post
    Ok, so as the title says, which is better/brighter?

    640nm @ 400mW
    650nm @ 1000mW

    Chroma has the 650 ahead on luminous flux, but I'm hearing conflicting stories about how they look in real life.

    Even better, anyone got any pics of similar ratios of 640/650 they can post?

    Thanks

    640nm period.

    the 650nm is most probbably a flashlight with a ver fat beam. this fat beam will most probbably spill over your galvo mirrors causing allot of power loss.
    It also got a high divrigence an will be very dim after a few meters and will not reach to the end of the venue like a laser with a small divirgence.


    here are some specs of a high quality lasermodule I resell: (no Chinese crap)


    - Diodelaser
    - 642nm +/- 3nm
    - >650mW
    - <2,6mmx2,6mm diameter of beam
    - <0,7 mrad beam spread angle
    - analog modulation 0-5V 0-100kHz
    - 75mmx48mmx45mm!!!!!!!

    Arctos got a nice article on there website explaining why divrigence is so important:

    http://www.arctoslaser.de/en/arctos_arguments.htm

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    178

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mccarrot View Post
    640nm period.

    Arctos got a nice article on there website explaining why divrigence is so important:

    http://www.arctoslaser.de/en/arctos_arguments.htm
    Hmmz, just noticed that the info on the OPS laser from Coherent is not "correct". Probably this data is from a not collimated version.
    Not really fair in this way, the OPS laser has a divergence of <1.5mrad with standard collimator (Diameter <1.0mm).
    So I would say a OPS red has more brightnes than the arctos 640nm diode combinement.
    But a lot more expensiver

    Here a link to a video where I did the control of the lasers. The setup was 2x 5W green OPS and 1x 1.5W Red OPS.
    Because the red OPS has a very small diameter and divergence it has a quite good visability together with the higher powered greens.
    Sure the greens where a lot brighter but I was supprised myself
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2lRVBZA5r0I
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGk2GCPxPNo

    Ontropic:
    I would go for the 640nm laser. Lower power but probably around the same visability = more safety
    Keep in your mind that the 650nm is probably a flashlight beam so after some distance not that usefull...
    Last edited by Francesco; 02-08-2010 at 14:20.

    Official Pangolin European Service & Repair Centre
    Authorised Distributor KVANT
    Please visit my webshop --> www.laserwebshop.com

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    veenwouden
    Posts
    2,580

    Default

    Thanks for the info Francesco but i,m guessing that no one can afford those. So lets stick to the lasers that we can afford.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Preston, Lancashire UK
    Posts
    1,069

    Default

    Hey Guys

    I've just bought a laserwave 650nm 350mW head from Rob Stanwax doing 415mw with tight beam specs just like the 640's.
    In RGB No.1, my 640 is a 150mW spec head doing just over 200mW. This is then cubed with a 250mw 671nm red dpss head. (I am losing about 40% of the 671 through the cube. )

    I've not had chance to compare but I'm quite confident that the 650 with in RGB No.2 will look just fine against the 640 + 671 red.

    Carl

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Southport, UK
    Posts
    2,746

    Default

    I can't really comment on the smaller 640, but the centre projector in this video is outputting 1.1W of (Laserwave) 650 red after the lossy cube with 1W of 532.

    I would hardly call it a flashlight.

    PS turn down the sound, the audio is blown to pieces!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RkYErDPStkU
    http://img62.imageshack.us/img62/3985/laser.gif

    Doc's website

    The Health and Safety Act 1971

    Recklessly interfering with Darwin’s natural selection process, thereby extending the life cycle of dim-witted ignorami; thus perpetuating and magnifying the danger to us all, by enabling them to breed and walk amongst us, our children and loved ones.





  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Amsterdam, NL
    Posts
    2,098

    Default

    @ Doc

    I think the 532nm in that projector is also higher than 1,5mRad, because non of the beams reach to the end of the room with equal brightness.

    Look at this picture I made, this RGB block got less than 1mRad so the lasers penetrate furter into the room
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails DSC00028.JPG  


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •