Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 23

Thread: lasorbs... should they have protected my diodes?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Vezon, Belgium
    Posts
    1,017

    Default

    hi,

    I must say again, I'm not blaming lasorb's operation, I know this is a manipulation/construction fault from me

    I was really curious of the reason the diodes are dead where the short-circuited lasorbs should have absorbed the surge by the short-circuit itself (if you follow me)

    the lasorbs would surely have functioned at the start of the surge, where initial voltage has been rather huge (bad switching power supply discharging in a wrong path), then voltage would have dropped in an unsafe region for them with currents high enough to fry them in the remaining time of the surge (I don't know if this is realistic, it is just an assumption)

    the diode blowout took place, for what I understand, somewhere between the moment the lasorbs began not to be able to sustain the discharge anymore and the time internal meltdown occurred

    perhaps they would have survived if I had quickly powered off the supply instead of literally punching the psu away to break inopinous contact (really lasted less than one second, somewhere like 600ms or 700ms counting the time my brain reacted, impulse through my nerves actuated my arm and contact was broken... in that kind of moment you are not able to tell even if you feel you reacted in less than one second)

    if pangolin in interested in investigating the internal meltdown process, I can ship the lasorbs, but I don't think there is any interest there... better feed them with rectified mains directly

    for the flexmods now, they are blown, since the surge traveled from V+ to ground through all the circuit... initial impulse will have killed the opamp, then the rest will have killed the transistor and laser diode

    sad thing, but no I have experienced that, every diode apparatus I'll design will be fully isolated and boxed... no question to play with bare apparatuses anymore

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Amsterdam, NL
    Posts
    2,098

    Default

    With this highside driver you do not have to isolate the diodes anymore and this accident would not have happend.

    http://store.laserextreme.nl/catalog...products_id/74

    Its a 6 channel driver and also includes a tec controller.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Vezon, Belgium
    Posts
    1,017

    Default

    well, I know, but the price is the eternal problem for persons like me who will never make any prestation to feed their wallet...

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Amsterdam, NL
    Posts
    2,098

    Default

    In the netherlands we have a quote: "Goedkoop is duurkoop" > "go cheap will cost more eventually".

    In this case the quote is right again, and I believe it applies to the complete laserhobby.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,622

    Default

    The validity of that quote depends on the person. It's very possible to supplant cost with ingenuity.. this is proven all the time.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    241

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by shrad View Post
    well, I know, but the price is the eternal problem for persons like me who will never make any prestation to feed their wallet...
    This might be an option then.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	SchematicV4..png 
Views:	36 
Size:	15.0 KB 
ID:	15645Click image for larger version. 

Name:	TreiberV4..png 
Views:	33 
Size:	743.0 KB 
ID:	15646

    I use them in my 300mW 642nm red:
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Laser642nm300mW..jpg 
Views:	48 
Size:	177.0 KB 
ID:	15647

    Andreas

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Vezon, Belgium
    Posts
    1,017

    Default

    that's a wonderful build!

    thanks for the schematic! I'll definitely give it a try!

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,622

    Default

    And there's your ingenuity... Thanks for sharing andythemechanic!

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    2,478

    Default

    Yes, that's good stuff. I never followed through with my plans for a small beam combiner, but it wouldn't have been that small. I might take it up again if the laser driver idea I have works though. Would be a lower, wider arrangement, with tiny TEC's under the diode mounts. I like the inventive use of grubscrews. I think my idea might be overdesigned, if Andy's has no difficulties with precise aligning. (I chose to use some very fine-threaded optician's screws that Jem got for me).

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    241

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The_Doctor View Post
    if Andy's has no difficulties with precise aligning. (I chose to use some very fine-threaded optician's screws that Jem got for me).
    Its not the easiest to align but very stable once it is aligned. I try to show how to align it with two pictures:
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	BeamCombinerBott&#111.png 
Views:	8 
Size:	22.9 KB 
ID:	15659Click image for larger version. 

Name:	BeamCombinerTop..png 
Views:	11 
Size:	25.8 KB 
ID:	15660
    First the nearfield has to be adjustet by moving the single holding blocks in the slot holes in the bottom plate. Than the blocks can be tightened and the assembly is clued to a TEC. than the farfield is adjusted with the 4 grub screws in the small tilt/rotation mount. Thats it. The grubscrews are not fine threaded, but normal M2.3 threads. I don't have tools for so small fine threads.
    Shrad, sorry for hijacking your thread! I will open another one for details of the Driver.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •