Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 31 to 38 of 38

Thread: 400mW 640nm vs 1.1 watt 650nm - Pics and videos! ;)

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    1,438

    Default

    @Stoney

    If you call 488nm blue, you'd probably call 612nm red...

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Charleston, SC
    Posts
    2,147,489,573

    Cool

    Quote Originally Posted by Stoney3K View Post
    100mW+ argon heads are becoming cheaper since everyone wants a DPSS, guess what I'm going to use for my blue.
    By the time you factor in the cost of an AOM to modulate your argon, plus the power loss across the crystal, and the extra electricity (and cooling) you'll need, the DPSS blue solution doesn't seem quite so expensive.

    True, for power levels above 200 mw, Argon is definitely cheaper even with all the added costs above, but I think for anything below 150 mw, you're really better off with a DPSS blue. The added complexity of an air-cooled argon isn't worth it at low power levels, in my opinion.

    Adam

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Miami, FL
    Posts
    3,590

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FloggedSynapse View Post
    Hm, I think part of the problem is the non-linear nature of our perception. It requires something like a 4-fold increase in power to appear twice as bright. 2x the power level will not appear twice as bright.
    huh? I was talking about lumens not mW...

    "The lumen (symbol: lm) is the SI unit of luminous flux, a measure of the power of light perceived by the human eye."

  4. #34
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    449

    Default

    But the lumen to power ratio is linear. green light is ~600lm/W, so 2W of green is ~1200lm, 3W of green is ~1800lm etc.

    1600 lumens do not appear twice as bright as 800 lm, but perhaps closer to 1.5 times.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Miami, FL
    Posts
    3,590

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Xytrell View Post
    But the lumen to power ratio is linear. green light is ~600lm/W, so 2W of green is ~1200lm, 3W of green is ~1800lm etc.

    1600 lumens do not appear twice as bright as 800 lm, but perhaps closer to 1.5 times.
    so then what would you suggest we measure perceived brightness in?

  6. #36
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    449

    Default

    Good question. Is there a scale analogous to the sound decibel? Maybe we can have light decibels with base 2 instead of 10

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Miami, FL
    Posts
    3,590

    Default

    take your pick

    Code:
    Quantity		Symbol	SI unit			Abbr.	Notes
    Luminous energy		Qv	lumen second		lm·s	units are sometimes called talbots
    Luminous flux		F	lumen (= cd·sr)		lm	also called luminous power
    Luminous intensity	Iv	candela (= lm/sr)	cd	an SI base unit
    Luminance		Lv	candela per square m	cd/m2	units are sometimes called "nits"
    Illuminance		Ev	lux (= lm/m2)		lx	Used for light incident on a surface
    Luminous emittance	Mv	lux (= lm/m2)		lx	Used for light emitted from a surface
    Luminous efficacy	 	lumen per watt		lm/W	ratio of luminous flux to radiant flux

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    15

    Default

    on the LEFT is 640, as it appears slightly more orange than the RIGHT

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •