Page 14 of 26 FirstFirst ... 410111213141516171824 ... LastLast
Results 131 to 140 of 251

Thread: Anamorphic prisms are go

  1. #131
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Uppsala, Sweden
    Posts
    72

    Default

    Ill get two sets!
    You know if these work with the red 638nm diodes aswell? in that case, i will take 4 =)

  2. #132
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    177

    Thumbs up

    Mine arrived too, many thanks!

    This set of prisms really make the 445nm party complete
    Here's a quick photo:

  3. #133
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    8

    Default

    I am still interested on 4 sets.

    Pardini

  4. #134
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    west sussex uk
    Posts
    2,280

    Default

    hi
    what was the distance of that pic taken?
    what lens did you use ?
    best i have managed so far is 20mm x 4mm @22m using aixiz 405nm lens
    thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by SrS View Post
    Mine arrived too, many thanks!

    This set of prisms really make the 445nm party complete
    Here's a quick photo:

  5. #135
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Herts, UK
    Posts
    1,254

    Default

    Hey DjMagnus, from the information out there so far these prisms should work with the 638nm diodes and correct the astigmatism to some degree.
    The AR coating is broadband and whilst not quite as effective out at wider angles with 638nm as it is with 445nm, it should still be pretty good. Rather than estimate how good or bad they are I'll test a pair of prisms on an astigmatic Mitsubishi 640nm/150mW diode tomorrow and post the results, also a PL member who also has these prisms has got one of the 638nm/500mW diodes on the way, so hopefully he can do a bit of testing and post up his findings.

    I'll put you down for 4 for now and we'll adjust that if they crap out on the red diodes..

    Quote Originally Posted by DjMagnus View Post
    Ill get two sets!
    You know if these work with the red 638nm diodes aswell? in that case, i will take 4 =)

  6. #136
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Herts, UK
    Posts
    1,254

    Default

    If focussed, then I'm guessing quite close.
    These diodes are quite nasty really, we're just taming the slow axis to make it acceptable but the fast axis is still a pigs shit in its own right.
    If you want to make a near perfect round beam then you'll need another pair of prisms on the fast axis to shrink the diameter and expand the divergence to better match the slow axis.
    Nasty diodes

    Quote Originally Posted by badger1666 View Post
    hi
    what was the distance of that pic taken?
    what lens did you use ?
    best i have managed so far is 20mm x 4mm @22m using aixiz 405nm lens
    thanks

  7. #137
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    South Lincs, UK
    Posts
    2,625

    Default

    I guess the extra 2 prisms, to correct the FA, would be mounted 90 degrees to the other SA adjusting pair?
    --------------------
    My Brain urt's!

    Continuously in Awe! of (H)Al, the Photonlexicon Font of Complete Knowledge - The (H)Al'PL Database of complete puss that no one needs to know or ever trusts as he ain't really got a Scooby doo about now't!

  8. #138
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    west sussex uk
    Posts
    2,280

    Default

    i did not know i could use two sets of prisms
    well i am off to my work shop then
    going to be a pain mounting them at 90deg to the others
    thanks
    simon

    Quote Originally Posted by p1t8ull View Post
    If focussed, then I'm guessing quite close.
    These diodes are quite nasty really, we're just taming the slow axis to make it acceptable but the fast axis is still a pigs shit in its own right.
    If you want to make a near perfect round beam then you'll need another pair of prisms on the fast axis to shrink the diameter and expand the divergence to better match the slow axis.
    Nasty diodes

  9. #139
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Herts, UK
    Posts
    1,254

    Default

    Indeedy 90 degrees
    And the prism angles would need to be reversed, so beam right to left in order to shrink the diameter and increase divergence:





    Quote Originally Posted by smogthemog View Post
    I guess the extra 2 prisms, to correct the FA, would be mounted 90 degrees to the other SA adjusting pair?

  10. #140
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    South Lincs, UK
    Posts
    2,625

    Default

    Also, is the distance from the 445 collimating lens to the first prism critical?
    I really need to put the first prism as close to lens as possible.
    My proposed setup below minus the prisms:
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails IMG_4650.JPG  

    --------------------
    My Brain urt's!

    Continuously in Awe! of (H)Al, the Photonlexicon Font of Complete Knowledge - The (H)Al'PL Database of complete puss that no one needs to know or ever trusts as he ain't really got a Scooby doo about now't!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •