Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 48

Thread: pencil lead thin 445nm beam-no prisms no cylinderical lens

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Cleveland Ohio
    Posts
    2,599

    Default

    all that sounds fine but on my wall it sure looks good. proof is in what works for your situation. simpler optics would be nice to get the same result. what would you suggest would be an equivalent to what I did with less optics?

    I have fog tonight and tried out a beamshow. Works well for that as well.

    I have prisms and lenses coming so when they come I'll try those as well. In the mean time this method works well for my needs.

    Sometimes the science just gets in the way of the art.......In this case I don't care why it works just that it does.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Texas, USA
    Posts
    50

    Default

    I just got a LPM and discovered my power was way under spec.
    Then I realized I had a red Axixz lens.(they look blue).
    They eat easily half of 445. I would say back reflection may be an issue,
    but these 445 diodes seem nearly indestructible, lol..
    Keep in mind though, it may be up to half a watt the lens may dissipate as heat!

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Cleveland Ohio
    Posts
    2,599

    Default

    I'LL DEFINITELY TRY THE ONES COATED FOR 445NM WHEN THEY GET THEM! i WAS NOT AWARE OF THE LOSE BEING THAT HIGH. IT LOOKS LIKE A SIMPLE AR COATING ON THE RED LENS TO MY EYE. NEVER BOTHER TO MEASURE LOSE SINCE i HAVE SOO MUCH EXCESS BLUE.(30 DAYS AGO i WAS PROUD THAT i HAD 50MW OF 445NM)

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Texas, USA
    Posts
    50

    Default

    Yeah, I had no idea either. Kind of a kick to the face, lol.
    Can't wait to get my 405-445 lenses. I have a blue lens,
    but it's dot is horrible.

    And the Red ones usually have a blue reflection.
    The blue ones usually have a yellow reflection.
    (the ones I've used)

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Amsterdam, NL
    Posts
    2,098

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kecked View Post
    all that sounds fine but on my wall it sure looks good. proof is in what works for your situation. simpler optics would be nice to get the same result. what would you suggest would be an equivalent to what I did with less optics?

    I have fog tonight and tried out a beamshow. Works well for that as well.

    I have prisms and lenses coming so when they come I'll try those as well. In the mean time this method works well for my needs.

    Sometimes the science just gets in the way of the art.......In this case I don't care why it works just that it does.
    Sure you get a nice beam at 20 feet with >3mRad, it simply did not got the time to diverge. now go and measuere the beam at 200 feet and post the results here, then you know what i mean

    But sure for small areas and beamshows only >3mRad beams will be ok, but mixing it with a 1mRad 660nm beam will give you problems at longer distances.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Amsterdam, NL
    Posts
    2,098

    Default

    It physics,
    if you make the beam smaller the divergence gets bigger
    If you make the beam bigger the divergence get smaller

    the fast axis the 445nm diode is a very small beam with a very high divergence. we use prismpairs or cylidrical lensen (like you discribed) to make the beam bigger and the divergence lower.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    1,009

    Default

    The two axis of the beam are different.
    What you want is something that will only change one axis (like a prism or a cyl lens)

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Amsterdam, NL
    Posts
    2,098

    Default

    for example the 445nm diode with a FL4,6 lens gives a beam like this:

    -

    where the fast axis is 0,7mm with 2,6-3mrad
    and the slow axis 3mm with 0,2 mrad.

    For lasershow use you want to have both axis as equal as possible.


    PS does the topicstarte allready tested his "mirracle pencil beam" solution at 200feet?

    It would be great to see him break the laws of phisics

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Central Florida
    Posts
    7,067

    Question

    Quote Originally Posted by mccarrot View Post
    for example the 445nm diode with a FL4,6 lens gives a beam like this:

    -

    where the fast axis is 0,7mm with 2,6-3mrad
    and the slow axis 3mm with 0,2 mrad.
    Can't you then go back and use a prism or cyl lense to correct the fast axis?

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Amsterdam, NL
    Posts
    2,098

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by allthatwhichis View Post
    Can't you then go back and use a prism or cyl lense to correct the fast axis?
    yes...... I was just trying to explain to king4quater.......



    There is NO need to use telescopes with only one or 2 diodes. if you need a pencil thin beam just take a aspheric lens with a very small FL but expect a very high divergence.

    If you want very low divergence take a lens with a high FL but then you will have a fat beam..... get it?

    This is the last post I will make in this topic, someone else can take over, getting a little bit tired... too many LPF'ers arround lately....

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •