Page 7 of 9 FirstFirst ... 3456789 LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 89

Thread: Another Laser Pointer Idiot

  1. #61
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    5,704

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ElektroFreak View Post
    You'll never hear me say that beams of high-intensity light don't pose a serious flash hazard to helicopter pilots.. it's airplane pilots that I think are better protected.
    In general to clarify my comments above, I do think that any high intensity light poses a risk to pilots through distraction and dazzle. I just don't personally believe all of the claims made by all of the pilots in the past. I think some are genuinely suffering flash blindness and eye damage and others are suffering a flash blindness placebo effect. I also think that in some cases there is an element of things being talked up to push the political agenda in favour of a pointer ban, something I'm not against anyway.

    However, that my personal non belief of lasting effects in most cases, doesn't in any way mitigate what I said in the 1st part of this paragraph, all high intensity light is dangerous to pilots even if its only in a transient way and anyone who shines any laser towards an aircraft of any kind is an idiot and if deliberate deserves jail. The issue of actual eye damage and longer lasting effects, is a seperate one which really needs to be scientifically proven in each individual incident to be believeable in my eyes.

  2. #62
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Mesa, AZ
    Posts
    1,279

    Default

    Thanks everyone for those great points! So in the case of helicopters only, clear nighttime conditions over a large urban area, 1W vertical blue beam, 30 seconds duration. The danger is either from the pilot flying into the stationary beam or from the light scattered from it sideways (or up if the pilot's near the beam). I'm NOT advocating doing this, just looking for real world experienced comments.

    So to do this legally, the FAA gets notified and pilots are informed to expect it from this location at these times, and everyone's happy that the operator and equipment are qualified to do it and keep it safe at the source. That about it?

    Do helicopter pilots over urban areas use night vision goggles? If not directly in the beam, seems to me it would take way more than 1W of blue light to do anything more than draw a pilot's attention (perhaps suddenly). Of course, then he's gonna have to worry about what the beam's going to do next. That's a distraction, and a threat.

  3. #63
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Knoxville, TN, USA
    Posts
    3,154

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Eidetic View Post
    Thanks everyone for those great points! So in the case of helicopters only, clear nighttime conditions over a large urban area, 1W vertical blue beam, 30 seconds duration. The danger is either from the pilot flying into the stationary beam or from the light scattered from it sideways (or up if the pilot's near the beam). I'm NOT advocating doing this, just looking for real world experienced comments.

    So to do this legally, the FAA gets notified and pilots are informed to expect it from this location at these times, and everyone's happy that the operator and equipment are qualified to do it and keep it safe at the source. That about it?

    Do helicopter pilots over urban areas use night vision goggles? If not directly in the beam, seems to me it would take way more than 1W of blue light to do anything more than draw a pilot's attention (perhaps suddenly). Of course, then he's gonna have to worry about what the beam's going to do next. That's a distraction, and a threat.
    1 watt of blue (or most any visible laser) is powerful enough to grab the attention of any pilot flying within visible range, whether fixed wing or helicopter.
    So yeah - theoretically - if following all the proper channels, regs, and precautions, and the location for the laser permits the activity (doesn't interfere with normal flight operations), the FAA should NOTAM the laser activity, and all should be well.

    These days, it's quite possible to have military, law enforcement, and EMS all using night vision goggles.
    And as you alluded to, just the sudden unexpected appearance of a laser within close proximity to an aircraft is enough to cause potential problems.

    Surprises while flying at night are generally not a lot of fun...
    RR

    Metrologic HeNe 3.3mw Modulated laser, 2 Radio Shack motors, and a broken mirror.
    1979.
    Sweet.....

  4. #64
    mixedgas's Avatar
    mixedgas is offline Creaky Old Award Winning Bastard Technologist
    Infinitus Excellentia Ion Laser Dominatus
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    A lab with some dripping water on the floor.
    Posts
    9,902

    Default

    [QUOTE=Eidetic;165112]Thanks everyone for those great points! So in the case of helicopters only, clear nighttime conditions over a large urban area, 1W vertical blue beam, 30 seconds duration. The danger is either from the pilot flying into the stationary beam or from the light scattered from it sideways (or up if the pilot's near the beam). I'm NOT advocating doing this, just looking for real world experienced comments.
    end quote

    There is no reason to repeat the test, with a aircraft and laser. ILDA did it 10+ years ago with a SP171 Ion, a hand held pointer, and a searchlight, with a actual helicopter. A few very high quality power measurement devices were on the aircraft. There is video and audio some place as well as a partial transcript. I know, I typed the transcript in a emergency for reasons involving a TV show. I no longer have the file, as the hard drive is not readable. My copy of the tape is in a landfill after a VCR shredded it.

    The FAA simulator study is also a good read.

    Steve
    Qui habet Christos, habet Vitam!
    I should have rented the space under my name for advertising.
    When I still could have...

  5. #65
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Mesa, AZ
    Posts
    1,279

    Default

    So what was the result???

  6. #66
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Brno, CZ / Povazska Bystrica, SK
    Posts
    491

    Default

    sorry to dig this old thread up but this got me burning

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-22636288

    "They have typically waited for emergency services to attend a fire before attacking them. Green laser pointers have also been shone in the eyes of the emergency services, according to Mr Lindgren."

    so there are people trying to protect other's lives and properties and pointer-kids intentionally shine them into face? what sick fuck would do that, i hope karma strikes them bad and they end up with their pointer deep up their retard ass

  7. #67
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    3,734

    Default

    I was really disappointed to see this post on hackaday today http://hackaday.com/2013/05/24/3w-ha...saber-someday/

    Not one mention of hazards and safety. The diffuse reflections from a 3W laser are a serious hazard, not to mention direct incidents.... Sending the wrong message hackaday...

    Trivialising high powered lasers is a dumb move...

  8. #68
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    5,704

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dzodzo View Post

    "They have typically waited for emergency services to attend a fire before attacking them.

    so there are people trying to protect other's lives and properties and ... what sick fuck would do that, i hope karma strikes them bad and they end up with their pointer deep up their retard ass
    Unfortunately, its all too frequent in the UK.

    Fire fighters in the UK get that on many many calls, so much so that in many areas they have to have a police escort and now have CCTV cameras recording everything:

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7238127.stm

    1,500 attacks during 2007 according to Fire Brigades Union (that's the latest set of figures I could find).

    All I can say is that this country is full of scum.

  9. #69
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Yellowknife, NT, Canada
    Posts
    2,147,484,113

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dnar View Post
    I was really disappointed to see this post on hackaday today http://hackaday.com/2013/05/24/3w-ha...saber-someday/

    Not one mention of hazards and safety. The diffuse reflections from a 3W laser are a serious hazard, not to mention direct incidents.... Sending the wrong message hackaday...

    Trivialising high powered lasers is a dumb move...

    The creator of that is a member on LPF - It's not like Hackaday to trivialise high powered lasers though, normally they do have safety warnings.

  10. #70
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    72

    Default

    Greatest 15km nm laser ever made.

    http://denver.craigslist.org/ele/3839491261.html
    Corporate Member ILDA

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •