Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Reducing Bandwidth

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    SOUTHAMPTON U.K.
    Posts
    1,357

    Default Reducing Bandwidth

    Just a though, but as bandwidth costs money, any way of reducing the amount of data through your server should save money on forum running costs.

    I know you have the option to upload photos and host them on the PL server. This is obviously where most of the band width goes. If all photos were hosted externally (Photobucket etc) and the link embedded it should cut down on the server capacity and hopefully save some running costs.

    To the reader, there is no difference, as the photo is still there and it would also remove that annoying delay when you click on an embedded thumbnail while you wait for the picture to load.

    Just a thought, but another forum I use (6K members) does this and halved their monthly costs.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    west sussex uk
    Posts
    2,280

    Default bandwidth

    dont know if that would go down well with paying members
    but there are alot of guests using this site would be good if non member bandwidth
    could be restricted
    When God said “Let there be light” he surely must have meant perfectly coherent light.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    5,704

    Default

    I don't see why hosting photos externally would make any difference to subscribers.

    Photobucket delete theirs quite quickly but imageshack leave them up for more or less whilst ever the link is in existence.

    Admin might choose to still host ilda files etc but leave photo and video to external links. That could save a lot of bandwidth and cost for no real detriment to users. For video there's Youtube or Vimeo. Fo photo there are many providers.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    west sussex uk
    Posts
    2,280

    Default bandwidth

    oh i get it now see what you mean did not think of stuff like that.
    i think the one that would save a lot would be that the pl ftp is restricted
    to members only. at the moment it open to the whole world
    When God said “Let there be light” he surely must have meant perfectly coherent light.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Athens, Greece
    Posts
    1,930

    Default

    i have been using imageshack on other forums and the photos stay there for ever.
    so it is a good idea
    "its called character briggs..."

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    SOUTHAMPTON U.K.
    Posts
    1,357

    Default

    Same with Photobucket. I have stuff thats been there for about 8 years.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    1,435

    Default

    I would suggest restricting download of attachments to those who are logged in.
    If I interpret the numbers right, 75% of the visitors are not logged in.

    If these visitors choose not to contribute to the community, then why offer them access to "our" content.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Charleston, SC
    Posts
    2,147,489,446

    Smile

    The last time Robert and I talked about this, he admitted that the bandwidth charges are *not* the major expense of running PhotonLexicon. Rather, it's the incredible load placed on the back-end database server. Everything is stored in the database, and every time you get served a page, the DB server is crunching away feeding the content to the web server. Plus, when people search PL, the server has to really work it's ass off to sort through all the posts and give you an answer in under a second. That takes some serious horsepower, and it's the limiting factor for just about everything related to the cost (and the scalability) of the forum.

    Spec has had to upgrade the class of hardware that the forum runs on several times. It started out as one site of literally dozens that were all hosted out of a single box at a service provider. Then he had to upgrade to a dedicated virtual server. Now he's seriously thinking about a no-shit real server just for PL. That is, a single machine (we're talking enterprise-class hardware here, not just some desktop PC) that does nothing but run PL... (Yeah, it's that big!)

    You would be astonished to see the log files for a typical month of PL usage. True, the bandwidth is high, but the back-end server stuff is really shocking. There's a shitload of work going on in the background every time the forum serves you a page. (That's one reason why our beloved Admin is so busy behind the scenes; there's a lot of stuff going on that he needs to keep an eye on.)

    Adam

    PS: If Spec ever did decide to encourage people to use other sites to host pictures, I would hope he'd suggest imgur instead of photobucket or imageshack. Imgur has no bandwidth restrictions, while the other two do.
    Last edited by buffo; 12-28-2010 at 04:42.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    1,435

    Default

    Then I would suggest restrict (advanced)search or other db intensive functionality to members who are logged in.

    (said the non-dark-blue member)

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Charleston, SC
    Posts
    2,147,489,446

    Smile

    Yeah, but that really hurts the usability of the forums. Guests come here looking for information. And typically they end up signing up once they see how great this place is, and how much information is available.

    But if they had to sign up before they could search for their answers, they might not bother. So I can see why Robert allows guests to search. (Though to discourage abuse by bots, guests have to answer a question before each search: They need to define one of the letters in the word "laser".)\

    Also, there is a limit of sorts placed on images that are hosted on the forums... You have to be logged in to view them. Of course, if you have the image hosted somewhere else, it will be visible for everyone, but if you select "host file locally" when you add an image, then it will only be visible to members who are logged in. So guests can't see them.

    Adam

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •