Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 40

Thread: I almost feel bad posting this.

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    5,704

    Default

    The German police really need to do something about this guy selling these devices.

    It can only end badly. To build one privately is one thing to demonstrate a concept but to sell them to potentially irresponsible purchasers is another.

    One poster claims to know the laser head used and posted
    On the same website, you will see a more accurate representation of what the laser head is capable of [150-200-milli-joules, or 50kW at 4nS 1064nm at 15-Joules of electrical input, 4mm beam].
    I don't know the equivolent of 50kw of energy over just 4ns in CW terms but I'm imagining its in the several hundred if not thousands of Watts range. Sounds very dangerous anyway and looking from the wood / plastic damage looks very dangerous!

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    118

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by White-Light View Post
    The German police really need to do something about this guy selling these devices.

    It can only end badly. To build one privately is one thing to demonstrate a concept but to sell them to potentially irresponsible purchasers is another.

    One poster claims to know the laser head used and posted

    I don't know the equivolent of 50kw of energy over just 4ns in CW terms but I'm imagining its in the several hundred if not thousands of Watts range. Sounds very dangerous anyway and looking from the wood / plastic damage looks very dangerous!
    The TUV will be pleased to hear about this.

    Did I also mention this guy has no idea whatsoever as to 1. the damage this device can cause both to humans and materials and 2. the protection and precautions required.

    Pulse width, Q-switching and peak power are all new concepts for him.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    1,066

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by goninanbl00d View Post
    The TUV will be pleased to hear about this.

    Did I also mention this guy has no idea whatsoever as to 1. the damage this device can cause both to humans and materials and 2. the protection and precautions required.

    Pulse width, Q-switching and peak power are all new concepts for him.
    he knows its dangerous. thats all he needs to know about it.
    know something is dangerous - treating it like a dangerous artifact comes automaticly.

    you made your points. dont make him afraid of laws.
    he's done a awesome piece of work and are you trying to mess that up?
    You are unique! Just like everyone else...
    Mum: What do you want for breakfast? Me: Lasers Ofcource!

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    1,438

    Default

    know something is dangerous - treating it like a dangerous artifact comes automaticly.
    NOT TRUE

    Everybody knows fireworks are dangerous, nevertheless thousands of accidents happen in the Netherlands each year just by plain recklessness.

    Blinding someone for life is a lot easier with a q-switched class IV handheld then with a firecracker.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    1,066

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by -bart- View Post
    NOT TRUE

    Everybody knows fireworks are dangerous, nevertheless thousands of accidents happen in the Netherlands each year just by plain recklessness.

    Blinding someone for life is a lot easier with a q-switched class IV handheld then with a firecracker.
    recklessness occurs if someone doesnt find something dangerous enough...

    All depends on the danger "factor" the person feels at the device.
    You are unique! Just like everyone else...
    Mum: What do you want for breakfast? Me: Lasers Ofcource!

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    East Sussex, England
    Posts
    5,248

    Default

    Are there hazards at play here, that are not even being thought about though?

    E.g. at the point you've blown the black paint off that tin, how much harmful radiation gets scattered back off the nice shiny metal surface beneath? How much occular hazard exists?
    Frikkin Lasers
    http://www.frikkinlasers.co.uk

    You are using Bonetti's defense against me, ah?

    I thought it fitting, considering the rocky terrain.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    118

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by norty303 View Post
    Are there hazards at play here, that are not even being thought about though?

    E.g. at the point you've blown the black paint off that tin, how much harmful radiation gets scattered back off the nice shiny metal surface beneath? How much occular hazard exists?
    Exactly. And how much of that is accounted for? Are there warnings?

    Even something simple, like trying to punch a hole through a steel razor blade. Put in a few hundred kilowatts in and you're bound to get at least a few watts of diffuse reflections (or even speculars) in your face.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    East Sussex, England
    Posts
    5,248

    Default

    Put in a few hundred kilowatts in and you're bound to get at least a few watts of diffuse reflections (or even speculars) in your face.
    But thats ok, because if you don't think about it, there is no 'danger factor' and so you're saved right?
    Frikkin Lasers
    http://www.frikkinlasers.co.uk

    You are using Bonetti's defense against me, ah?

    I thought it fitting, considering the rocky terrain.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Emmaus, PA
    Posts
    208

    Default

    Even with all the obvious danger of strapping a Q-switched SSY-1 to a pistol grip aside, it did quite bother me with his disrespect towards Twhite who basically called him on his outright lie of 1MW when he didn't even really have a concept of pulse width.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    118

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MarioMaster View Post
    Even with all the obvious danger of strapping a Q-switched SSY-1 to a pistol grip aside, it did quite bother me with his disrespect towards Twhite who basically called him on his outright lie of 1MW when he didn't even really have a concept of pulse width.
    Apparently we're 'hating on him' and we're being 'too serious'.

    I don't see what's not too serious about strapping an SSY-1 to a pistol and marketing it as a toy.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •