Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 63

Thread: 20 Diode Modules

  1. #41
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Knoxville, TN, USA
    Posts
    3,154

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by allthatwhichis View Post
    I just want to see the array going full blast.
    Yeah - what he said!!!!
    RR

    Metrologic HeNe 3.3mw Modulated laser, 2 Radio Shack motors, and a broken mirror.
    1979.
    Sweet.....

  2. #42
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    3,513

    Default

    I've been in Boston for a few days and it will be some days before I take some beam shots. However, I was successful with the retaining spring replacement on both the large first stage arrays and they work very nicely. Even so I expect that beam combining will be a bear. 20 diodes through the first stage to 4 parallel groups then 4 groups stacked by the 4 mirrors of the second stage array to one beam then reflected through a reducing telescope to less than 8mm to fit on the scanner and then repeat for the second module. Oh boy.

    The water blocks that back up the TEC coolers are probably optimal as they are. The Iwiki pump, an RLT 20, has a MEASURED flow through the two parallel heads of 5L/min. each. This is 80cc/sec=320W/C. So even with the blue module maxed out with 200W/diodes+600W TEC+30W environment=830W or a delta of 2.5 C. The step difference between the two sides is only 1.25C and so the difference across the smaller region of the diode array is somewhat less than this. This is relatively insignificant. Nevertheless, if you wanted to reduce this number further then the best method would be to increase the flow. Simply enlarging the 3/8 tubing to 1/2 inch would more than double the flow and cut the differential proportionally. I chose not to do this because of the increased weight and stiffness.

  3. #43
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Athens, Greece
    Posts
    1,930

    Default

    thank you very much for all this info!!
    "its called character briggs..."

  4. #44
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    3,513

    Default

    I am making steady progress, but I was correct that aligning 20 diodes would take some time. The new tension springs are much easier to use and are very stable. Except for one or two of the knife edge mirrors where the set screw threads were cut less carefully and have approximately 200u rad. drift. The knife edge arrays are very stable. The alignment process is iterative. First you fine focus each diode's collimation lens on a far field screen, then place the first knife edge array and group each five diode horizontal strip at right angles to the module and spaced the same 18mm vertically apart as are the diodes in the array. Next, insert the second knife edge tower. Bring the four groups down to the right angle and out to a far field mirror (second surface bathroom tile) and then project the far field image back to the module. Now it is much easier to see and adjust small errors in focus and alignment and so you begin the process focus/align focus/align etc...

    The Vashio 532 is operating at 1.0 watts (measured) as a comparison to the 445 array operating at 7.0 watts (estimated). The far field patterns are similar and at 36 meters on the side of the tree are approximately 75mm in diameter.

    As you can see, the array is still operating at room temperature and will need a 2:1 reducing telescope to fit on the scanner. Next comes the red module which will also need a similar reducing telescope (optics ordered). Although it seems like a lot of work, this is a LOT of fun.

    More pics:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC01346.JPG 
Views:	194 
Size:	125.0 KB 
ID:	25126Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC01350.JPG 
Views:	198 
Size:	138.5 KB 
ID:	25127Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC01358.JPG 
Views:	190 
Size:	54.3 KB 
ID:	25128Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC01356.JPG 
Views:	179 
Size:	35.7 KB 
ID:	25129Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC01347.JPG 
Views:	165 
Size:	98.8 KB 
ID:	25130Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC01354.JPG 
Views:	187 
Size:	76.9 KB 
ID:	25131Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC01349.JPG 
Views:	157 
Size:	97.2 KB 
ID:	25132Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC01355.JPG 
Views:	184 
Size:	37.8 KB 
ID:	25133

  5. #45
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Miami, FL
    Posts
    3,590

    Default


  6. #46
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Central Florida
    Posts
    7,067

    Thumbs up

    HOLY sweet Jesus!

  7. #47
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Charleston, SC
    Posts
    2,147,489,533

    Thumbs up Please... oh please!

    It's already been asked, but seeing as there hasn't been an answer yet, I'll ask again:

    Is there any chance we'll be able to see this awesome rig in person at SELEM this summer?

    Adam

  8. #48
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    the hills
    Posts
    983

    Default

    I don't think I can make SELEM this year, **BUT** i might drive straight there, have a look and go straight back home in time for work if you will bring that monster.


    c'mon, plz.....

  9. #49
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    3,513

    Default

    I AM planning to come to the SELEM unless something unexpected comes up. I will have to fly out of Logan and as this projector was designed to be a semi-permanent installation it's bulky. And maybe a little delicate? I just don't think it is practical to bring it. I will continue to post pictures and maybe if there is ever a LEM near Boston I can bring this projector or version 2.0. Thanks for your intense interest; it's fun to read.

  10. #50
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Maine, US
    Posts
    177

    Default

    Another reason for a NELEM!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •