I think it has grown quite because we have NO answers yet. No further information...from any direction....Will higher magnification Cylinderical lenses provide less divergence ?? Will DRLava sell them ?? When or will the unknown collimination lens be identified ?? Will the results of Andyf97 be duplicated ?? What exactly were his beam geometries at aperture and beam termination ?? ALL UNKNOWNS !! PLUS the other unanswered questions of;
Does anyone have access to Optics simulation programs ?
Has pseudonomen137's mRad Calculator been knife edge verified ?
Are fibre optics a possible beam corrective solution ?( I can answer this one....not without extreme mW loss )
I suppose no answer means NO ? I am at a stand still. My goal would also be to equal the prism correct output of a 445LD. Perhaps this is a dead end !!! Hopefully not !! But if it is...it is !! The quest goes on !! I wish we had some more answers !!!!!! The sooner the better !!!
CDBEAM
Beam Axiom #1 ~The Quantum well is DEEP ! Photons for ALL !!
.
Beam Axiom #2 ~Yes...As a matter of fact...I DO wear tinfoil on my head !!
.
Beam Axiom #3 ~Whe'n dout...Po ah Donk awn et !!
.
Beam Axiom #4 ~A Chicken in every Pot, and a Laser Lumia in every Livingroom !!
.
Beam Axiom #5 ~"Abstract Photonic Expressionism"....is "Abstractonimical" !!
.
Beam Axiom #6 ~ "A Posse ad Essea" ~ From being possible to being actual ...is the beam target !