Page 28 of 140 FirstFirst ... 1824252627282930313238 ... LastLast
Results 271 to 280 of 1395

Thread: Mitsubishi ML520G71...Red Holy Grail or Flashlight Fail ??

  1. #271
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    MI, flint, farmington hills
    Posts
    569

    Default

    yeah i was hoping to get a look at one of those in action
    Okay i have to know 2 of these laser connected threw pbs each laser giving out 300mw so around 600mw out.
    is there any way i can get this beam to be that of a 445nm laser with a power of 300mw?
    im not looking for perfect even if i have to lose 50% can it be done
    right now im running a dual lpc-815 for around 500mw of red.
    would 2 of those at the lower nm be brighter?

  2. #272
    SpaceJay is offline THIS USER WAS CLUEBYFOURED
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    86

    Default

    Hey you guys think that fiber optics might help out with this diode? Use a single or multimode fiber then try to use DR optics? It's worth a try even if you guys think it won't work. Who knows, you may be surprised

  3. #273
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Monroe, Mi USA
    Posts
    818

    Default

    I think it has grown quite because we have NO answers yet. No further information...from any direction....Will higher magnification Cylinderical lenses provide less divergence ?? Will DRLava sell them ?? When or will the unknown collimination lens be identified ?? Will the results of Andyf97 be duplicated ?? What exactly were his beam geometries at aperture and beam termination ?? ALL UNKNOWNS !! PLUS the other unanswered questions of;

    Does anyone have access to Optics simulation programs ?
    Has pseudonomen137's mRad Calculator been knife edge verified ?
    Are fibre optics a possible beam corrective solution ?( I can answer this one....not without extreme mW loss )

    I suppose no answer means NO ? I am at a stand still. My goal would also be to equal the prism correct output of a 445LD. Perhaps this is a dead end !!! Hopefully not !! But if it is...it is !! The quest goes on !! I wish we had some more answers !!!!!! The sooner the better !!!

    CDBEAM
    Beam Axiom #1 ~The Quantum well is DEEP ! Photons for ALL !!
    .
    Beam Axiom #2 ~Yes...As a matter of fact...I DO wear tinfoil on my head !!
    .
    Beam Axiom #3 ~Whe'n dout...Po ah Donk awn et !!
    .
    Beam Axiom #4 ~A Chicken in every Pot, and a Laser Lumia in every Livingroom !!
    .
    Beam Axiom #5 ~"Abstract Photonic Expressionism"....is "Abstractonimical" !!
    .
    Beam Axiom #6 ~ "A Posse ad Essea" ~ From being possible to being actual ...is the beam target !

  4. #274
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    MI, flint, farmington hills
    Posts
    569

    Default

    right now i am using an uncorrected 445nm so im not huge on beam specs.
    Would this equal a uncorrected 445nm beam?

  5. #275
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Monroe, Mi USA
    Posts
    818

    Default

    Did a quick eyeball look.... My eye sez that the Drlava corrected ML520G71 has slightly less divergence than a uncorrected 445...but has more divergence than a prism corrected 445. By uncorrected 445....I mean only corrected with an O-Like Aspherical Glass lens. This quick look is just an opinion. No measurements were taken and the distance to the target was 4M. The more deeply I get into this....the more I want a some type of CCD set up to accurately measure beam profile !!!

    BEAM
    Beam Axiom #1 ~The Quantum well is DEEP ! Photons for ALL !!
    .
    Beam Axiom #2 ~Yes...As a matter of fact...I DO wear tinfoil on my head !!
    .
    Beam Axiom #3 ~Whe'n dout...Po ah Donk awn et !!
    .
    Beam Axiom #4 ~A Chicken in every Pot, and a Laser Lumia in every Livingroom !!
    .
    Beam Axiom #5 ~"Abstract Photonic Expressionism"....is "Abstractonimical" !!
    .
    Beam Axiom #6 ~ "A Posse ad Essea" ~ From being possible to being actual ...is the beam target !

  6. #276
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    MI, flint, farmington hills
    Posts
    569

    Default

    Hmm well i think thats good enough for me then!
    I dont think the divergence of the 445nm is to bad.
    So its time to order 2 of these diodes then!

  7. #277
    SpaceJay is offline THIS USER WAS CLUEBYFOURED
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    86

    Default

    CDBEAM I've read up to page 5 so far in this thread. I'm reading the rest now. But what would happen if you used two sets of DRLava lenses?
    Would that be a stupid idea?

  8. #278
    SpaceJay is offline THIS USER WAS CLUEBYFOURED
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    86

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kiyoukan View Post
    Hmm well i think thats good enough for me then!
    I dont think the divergence of the 445nm is to bad.
    So its time to order 2 of these diodes then!
    You're buying me one?? You're too kind Kiyoukan

  9. #279
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    MI, flint, farmington hills
    Posts
    569

    Default

    space jay are you the same jay from place?
    and sry no i got to build my projector and have it ready by the 31

  10. #280
    SpaceJay is offline THIS USER WAS CLUEBYFOURED
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    86

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kiyoukan View Post
    space jay are you the same jay from place?
    and sry no i got to build my projector and have it ready by the 31
    I'm just kidding man. Good luck on your projector

    Um from what place?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •