Page 99 of 140 FirstFirst ... 899596979899100101102103109 ... LastLast
Results 981 to 990 of 1395

Thread: Mitsubishi ML520G71...Red Holy Grail or Flashlight Fail ??

  1. #981
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    MI, flint, farmington hills
    Posts
    569

    Default

    i just hope and pray i know the device these are going into if so what ever asking price is on them is worth every penny.
    Would make sense why they are so hard to get hands on atm with the demand to get the product on the market.
    The only places you can get them are asking well over 500$ one wants over 1,000$
    So if you want them at a decent price were still looking around, but maybe some people here should start buying and testing all the hybrids laser/led video projectors.
    There are several on the market, yes some of them cost over 1,400$ but what may be inside them could be worth a heck of alot more.
    Hey andyf97 you going to be on skype?

  2. #982
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    St. Louis
    Posts
    526

    Default

    There are two promising looking modes from BenQ and Optoma that I plan on picking up. Hoping to see red and blue diodes in them.

  3. #983
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    MI, flint, farmington hills
    Posts
    569

    Default

    yup let me know if you need any help to recover their costs.
    I would love to get my hands on something new to play with.

  4. #984
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    St. Louis
    Posts
    526

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kiyoukan View Post
    yup let me know if you need any help to recover their costs.
    I would love to get my hands on something new to play with.
    I will let you know. I will also post up all the info I find for everyone.

  5. #985
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    MI, flint, farmington hills
    Posts
    569

    Default

    That is the way to do it!
    I kinda hate when people hide and try to keep things that could revolutionize this hobby.
    I just love these red diodes.
    I cant believe they took this long to tame.
    i think im going to start using these with my 445nm diodes as well for dual setups and quads with amazing beam specs.
    a dual 445nm at 2W plus a quad 635nm at 2W plus dual 532nm 500mw lasers.
    Should make for a decent projector.
    The biggest thing is to match all the beams to the green lasers.
    Its not huge but enough to light up a indoor show with no fog.

  6. #986
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    4,382

    Default

    I've been testing the G71 diode now for over 5 months running it at >800mA with an output above 600mW with no sign of degradation. Looks promising. Just getting ready to glue Dave's lens in the retainer and start summore testing w/ the Lavalenses. Will post the results soon..

    Kiyoukan wrote:
    I just love these red diodes.
    I cant believe they took this long to tame.
    Well, CDBeam started this thread about 6 months ago, so for an R&D Team such as we have here, that's not too bad for a project of this magnitude. Quite ambitious.. Of course if we had a boss breathing down our necks it'd be quite different, I'm sure
    Last edited by steve-o; 03-14-2012 at 15:46.

  7. #987
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    MI, flint, farmington hills
    Posts
    569

    Default

    800ma huh?
    Thats about 50ma more than me and at 750ma im getting just a tiny bit over 515mw.
    And i thought a member who wanted to driver his at 850ma was a bit much but maybe not.
    I wish we had a murder fund going on where we leave a diode on constant for weeks till it dies. i think if we TEC these to 15C they would last a very long time.

  8. #988
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    4,382

    Default

    Yup, 825 to be exact.. Just tried new Daves lens with my 'old' set of Lavalenses and son-of-a b ... looks like a dpss round dot .. man .. if it wasn't so late and I had to get some sleep for work tomorrow i'd def be off with the scales to take some measurements ....
    Anybody worked with the new higher-mag Lavalenses yet? Are they bettah ? ..
    PS- just thought I'd add that the rotation on the Lava cyl lenses is difficult.. has to be spot-on .. y'all heve a good nite .. zzzzzz....

  9. #989
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Monroe, Mi USA
    Posts
    818

    Default The Pilgrimage

    GOOD results fellow Knights !!

    With the new 6X Cylinderical lenses from Kiyoukan, coupled to the 2mm fL Collimation lens from Dave…My resulting beam geometry is an mrad of 1.05 !! Nearfield 2mm x 4mm. At 4.3 meters (14 ')… the Farfield is approx 8.5mm square. ( Yes…I will experiment with a greater Farfield in the next few days ). These are the BEST results I have obtained with the G71 yet. First lens is about 33mm from the Collimation lens front. Plano to Plano separation about 62mm. See attached drawing of the lens holder.

    All I can say is the beam geometry is equal to my green DPSS. The pics do not really do the comparison justice. Turns out that my green DPSS has the most divergence in my RGB…NOT the blue.

    I am going to have to “Raise the Bar" a little. All along I stated that my goal was to equal the divergence of the prism corrected 445…but…consider this;

    The integration of this G71 red set up into any projector means that the red beam geometry will have to be equal to OR be less than the WORST divergence in any given color in that projector !!! It does NOT matter WHAT color that is !!! For this Red Set UP....I think I have arrived.
    As the pics show…the red disc, although slightly less defined in the pic, and having some slight vertical wings is equal to my DPSS output

    All I can say is that....when viewing it in person....the G71 geometry is on par with my Green DPSS....and therefore when viewing the combined RGB output from my projector...the G71 would be seamless integrated as a red source.
    There remain some slight vertical wings... that I have lessened...but not completely eliminated with the pinhole augmentation. The pinhole causes almost no mW loss. The pinhole is really a 4mm wide by 2mm tall slot placed about 30 mm after the front convex lens.

    Is the G71 the Grail ??? Well…It is NOT the Fail…THAT much I will say. The next step will be to construct a more permanent unit…and swap out my 640nm Laserwave unit. The Laserwave has a pre dichro PO of 394 mW and a very tight geometry…better than my Green DPSS.

    See the pics…and enjoy our continued….pilgrimage. BEAM

    Note: The C-Lens holder is not yet finished in these pics
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails 6X Lens Holder Special for Cut Optics V2.JPG  

    Ortho View 1.jpg  

    Front View.jpg  

    Top View 1.jpg  

    Side by Side increased contrast 1.jpg  

    Red combined with Green at the Farfield.jpg  

    Ortho View 2.jpg  

    Last edited by CDBEAM; 03-14-2012 at 21:14. Reason: Updated pic and added note
    Beam Axiom #1 ~The Quantum well is DEEP ! Photons for ALL !!
    .
    Beam Axiom #2 ~Yes...As a matter of fact...I DO wear tinfoil on my head !!
    .
    Beam Axiom #3 ~Whe'n dout...Po ah Donk awn et !!
    .
    Beam Axiom #4 ~A Chicken in every Pot, and a Laser Lumia in every Livingroom !!
    .
    Beam Axiom #5 ~"Abstract Photonic Expressionism"....is "Abstractonimical" !!
    .
    Beam Axiom #6 ~ "A Posse ad Essea" ~ From being possible to being actual ...is the beam target !

  10. #990
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Romania
    Posts
    1,041

    Default

    CDBeam,

    Your layout there is wonderful, nice and clean setup.

    You could try a particle filer after the 2mm lens to clean it up better or put your pinhole before the collimator.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •