Page 51 of 140 FirstFirst ... 4147484950515253545561 ... LastLast
Results 501 to 510 of 1395

Thread: Mitsubishi ML520G71...Red Holy Grail or Flashlight Fail ??

  1. #501
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Monroe, Mi USA
    Posts
    818

    Default

    YES...Thanx PB for more information to build on....er....ah....." Another Brick in the Wall ".....or...." Roll that Beam(n) footage !!"

    BEAM
    Beam Axiom #1 ~The Quantum well is DEEP ! Photons for ALL !!
    .
    Beam Axiom #2 ~Yes...As a matter of fact...I DO wear tinfoil on my head !!
    .
    Beam Axiom #3 ~Whe'n dout...Po ah Donk awn et !!
    .
    Beam Axiom #4 ~A Chicken in every Pot, and a Laser Lumia in every Livingroom !!
    .
    Beam Axiom #5 ~"Abstract Photonic Expressionism"....is "Abstractonimical" !!
    .
    Beam Axiom #6 ~ "A Posse ad Essea" ~ From being possible to being actual ...is the beam target !

  2. #502
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    East Sussex, England
    Posts
    5,248

    Default

    Hiya all, I've been following this thread on and off, but I've got lost along the way a bit.

    What is the purpose of the correction optics before the cube? Could you not use a waveplate on one pre-cube then use a single correction optics post-cube? O(R is this what Andy was suggesting when he posted his parts list?
    Frikkin Lasers
    http://www.frikkinlasers.co.uk

    You are using Bonetti's defense against me, ah?

    I thought it fitting, considering the rocky terrain.

  3. #503
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    west sussex uk
    Posts
    2,280

    Default

    Norty it would be near impossble to do it that way as they need to be
    The exact same distance from the first collimator or one beam will be slightly larger the other
    ie for mine its 64mm to the first lava lens, to get equal beam sizes and divergrnce
    When God said “Let there be light” he surely must have meant perfectly coherent light.

  4. #504
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Grand Rapids, Mi
    Posts
    2,538

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by norty303 View Post
    Hiya all, I've been following this thread on and off, but I've got lost along the way a bit.

    What is the purpose of the correction optics before the cube? Could you not use a waveplate on one pre-cube then use a single correction optics post-cube? O(R is this what Andy was suggesting when he posted his parts list?
    I have done it this way with the 445's, you just slide one mount pre cube to compensate. I plan on trying it with these once my waveplate arrives.
    leading in trailing technology

  5. #505
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    East Sussex, England
    Posts
    5,248

    Default

    Yes, that would be my immediate way of solving it, by simply making the path lengths equal, pre-cube. Surely that could make the design smaller overall too? And cheaper?

    Tempted to have a play, I have a broadband cube and correction optics left over from the last group buy in the 445 frenzy.
    Frikkin Lasers
    http://www.frikkinlasers.co.uk

    You are using Bonetti's defense against me, ah?

    I thought it fitting, considering the rocky terrain.

  6. #506
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    west sussex uk
    Posts
    2,280

    Default

    as long as you got the lava lens and some time for a lot of fiddling you should be good, though you will also need one of daves short fl lens and speical diode mounts
    to get the best beam, but just short fl lens will get you by
    Quote Originally Posted by norty303 View Post
    Yes, that would be my immediate way of solving it, by simply making the path lengths equal, pre-cube. Surely that could make the design smaller overall too? And cheaper?

    Tempted to have a play, I have a broadband cube and correction optics left over from the last group buy in the 445 frenzy.
    When God said “Let there be light” he surely must have meant perfectly coherent light.

  7. #507
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Eindhoven, The Netherlands
    Posts
    921

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by steve-o View Post
    Ok-I'm lost .. Badger now has >800mw with a dual diode setup @ ~1 mrad divergence .. who's the winner so far .. ? My HL6388/405G2 setup isn't going to cut that record . . We need a spreadsheet or something ..
    I'm starting to think something very fundamental here:

    Nail, meet 660nm coffin.

    OK, so we've got blue down, red down, only one colour left... Anyone up for bets on when the first direct green with decent power is going to show up?

  8. #508
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    4,382

    Default

    The dpss greens are cheap enough.. dpss vs diode.. what's the diff except for color. Good luck getting lava-lenses.. I ordered mine last month ... still waiting .. c/c hasnt been charged tho .. has he dropped off the map ?
    660 and 638; Ive read that they just add together beautifully to expand the color palette .

  9. #509
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Grand Rapids, Mi
    Posts
    2,538

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by steve-o View Post
    The dpss greens are cheap enough.. dpss vs diode.. what's the diff except for color. Good luck getting lava-lenses.. I ordered mine last month ... still waiting .. c/c hasnt been charged tho .. has he dropped off the map ?
    660 and 638; Ive read that they just add together beautifully to expand the color palette .
    Yes love them mixed, it is just way to orange without 660.

    I would like DI green, just for the stability. My ambient temp messes with DPSS
    leading in trailing technology

  10. #510
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    4,382

    Default

    DI green is in infancy stages, I believe. It's gonna take a while for it to develop to mass prod probly ..

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •