Page 101 of 140 FirstFirst ... 91979899100101102103104105111 ... LastLast
Results 1,001 to 1,010 of 1395

Thread: Mitsubishi ML520G71...Red Holy Grail or Flashlight Fail ??

  1. #1001
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Romania
    Posts
    1,041

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kiyoukan View Post
    that is correct i am trying to compile all the test data and make the OP in the GB thread have all the needed info.
    But the GB is very close to a go.
    4 units left.
    after this GB I am not going to do it a second time unless we can get 50.
    So this may be the only time to get them.
    Its a 5 minute job to update the first post, just get on with it. And if you just need two more for the GB, add me to the list for 2 sets.

  2. #1002
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    4,382

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by andyf97 View Post
    Ahh Steve, I did not realize the prices had dropped so much, last time I was looking at these diodes was 2011 and then were around 70usd.
    Yeh, a lot has changed in just a few months .. for the better

  3. #1003
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    4,382

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenechlaser View Post
    Depending on what you wan. If I remember correctly, ki has one set of PCX-PCX left (Where PCX is planoconvex and PCV is planoconcave). Originally the PCX-PCX design was chosen due to ease of manufacture and the fact that Ki wanted to knifedge two beams together at the focal length the first (10mm fl) PCX lens produces, which turned out to be very unstable. Thus why have a large distance (70mm) between lenses when with a PCX-PCV you have the same functionality but a shorter distance - which in some projcectors distance is a very limiting factor.
    I wan a good beam. Space is not a concern (unless it's over 180mm)

  4. #1004
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Malta
    Posts
    77

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by steve-o View Post
    I wan a good beam. Space is not a concern (unless it's over 180mm)
    Unfortunately in my case it is :/ Trying to fit scanners and lasers on a baseplate 210mm x 190mm in a already small housing..

  5. #1005
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    MI, flint, farmington hills
    Posts
    569

    Default

    that is a very small plate are you upgrading a reke projector or something

  6. #1006
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    MI, flint, farmington hills
    Posts
    569

    Default

    sry for the dbl post on mobile but the GB thread opening post has been redone please give it a look. as we have gotten enough sets to place the order.
    if you are not on the list let me know.
    i am unsure if i will be running this a second time so if you can order more you might want to.
    you guys will love the beam off these setups its so nice to have a good bright red.

  7. #1007
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Malta
    Posts
    77

    Default

    I managed to obtain an old Laser Science projector. The only thing that was worth salvaging was the case (HeNe tube smashed to bits and lissajous motors all corroded). I decided to keep it and use it for my projector, hence my small baseplate.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20102009221.jpg 
Views:	26 
Size:	696.5 KB 
ID:	31113

  8. #1008
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    3,513

    Default

    I can't locate a post that covers this, but was the general consensus that the cylinder expanders (such as with the GB) are useful if trying to combine multiple diodes AND THEN passing the composite beam through an expansion stage or will each diode have to be pre-expanded?

  9. #1009
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Zweibrücken, Germany
    Posts
    605

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by planters View Post
    I can't locate a post that covers this, but was the general consensus that the cylinder expanders (such as with the GB) are useful if trying to combine multiple diodes AND THEN passing the composite beam through an expansion stage or will each diode have to be pre-expanded?
    Well I managed to design a quad setup where only one set of cylinders will be required. This is with the lava cylinders due to wanting to keep the footprint smaller but will work with the GB cylinders as well. Main thing is to keep the beam paths equal lenghts.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails 638nm Quad.png  


  10. #1010
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    MI, flint, farmington hills
    Posts
    569

    Default

    Yup you can build a quad setup with one set of correction optics, but it becomes a bit harder due to the amount of space you have to work with is about 30mm to have both the knife edge and then the pbs cube.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •