Here: http://www.o-like.com/index.php?main...roducts_id=163
Still €103 for a HL6385DG![]()
O-like
10 chars
oops beat me to it SRS lol
thanks to both of you
and thanks to steve for his experiments
"its called character briggs..."
Kind of lost track of these ML520G71 threads. After completing a 2X with cube I wanted to do a three with no cube. Bye the way.... puting the correction optics after the cube or after knifing two diodes is a PITA. The high magnification of the tele makes positioning VERY critical.
Here's the specs: 405-g-1 lenses, 5X5 mm at aperture and .6mRad X .75mRad. 855mW at .5 amps. Have some better cylinders on order that should get me 10% more power (hopefully).
Also, with the same arrangement and thor labs ~3mm fl lenses I can do 4 diodes with 5X5mm and .6 X ~1mRad.
![]()
I have studied this pic.....and I am confused !!!!! It looks like you are going thru cylinderical optics.....knife edging.....then thru a set of anamorphic prisms ??? Is that what I am looking at ??? Thanx.
Beam
Beam Axiom #1 ~The Quantum well is DEEP ! Photons for ALL !!
.
Beam Axiom #2 ~Yes...As a matter of fact...I DO wear tinfoil on my head !!
.
Beam Axiom #3 ~Whe'n dout...Po ah Donk awn et !!
.
Beam Axiom #4 ~A Chicken in every Pot, and a Laser Lumia in every Livingroom !!
.
Beam Axiom #5 ~"Abstract Photonic Expressionism"....is "Abstractonimical" !!
.
Beam Axiom #6 ~ "A Posse ad Essea" ~ From being possible to being actual ...is the beam target !
That's exactly it.
Still having trouble getting rid of the "wings". It seems as though a lot of the power is in the "wings". If the "wings" are masked off and a power measurement is taken before and after the mask there is a big difference. Like around 25% depending on how close the mask gets to the main beam.
Anyone having luck with the "wings"?
Wow that's a cool setup Logsquared. How much power output with and without the wings?