Page 1 of 6 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 52

Thread: Been Playing With some 638

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Essex, UK
    Posts
    8,648

    Default Been Playing With some 638

    i feel a bit left out with all these builds threads been posted on the forum recently so -

    been playing with some 638 diodes.





    correction lens added for the below two pics



    @ 18 metres

    Eat Sleep Lase Repeat

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Wiltshire, UK
    Posts
    579

    Default

    Any chance of a shot of the setup with the corrective lenses in place.

    Looking good, I'm waiting for the GB to complete then I can build a new red.
    Squat that bug,

    One day I'll finish my build.
    https://www.facebook.com/Azteclasers?fref=ts

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Essex, UK
    Posts
    8,648

    Default

    um i dont to hand no, but just picture the top image with two lens in front of the beam lol ;-)
    Eat Sleep Lase Repeat

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Wiltshire, UK
    Posts
    579

    Default

    I was lead to believe that that would not work as all the diodes are different distances from the corrective lenses, but it seen you have got good results Andy.
    Squat that bug,

    One day I'll finish my build.
    https://www.facebook.com/Azteclasers?fref=ts

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    4,382

    Default

    Andy, are you using Daves & Lavalenses, or is this a top sekret build Lookin' good! .. unless this is a 63133 LD, in which case you're cheatng

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    East Sussex, England
    Posts
    5,248

    Default

    Tony, I believe the critical distances are in relation to the 635nm G71 and 73 diodes, not the 638's, which can be stacked much like the 642's, 660's, etc
    Frikkin Lasers
    http://www.frikkinlasers.co.uk

    You are using Bonetti's defense against me, ah?

    I thought it fitting, considering the rocky terrain.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Miami, FL
    Posts
    3,590

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by norty303 View Post
    Tony, I believe the critical distances are in relation to the 635nm G71 and 73 diodes, not the 638's, which can be stacked much like the 642's, 660's, etc
    I thought the G71/73 are 637 not 635?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    East Sussex, England
    Posts
    5,248

    Default

    Depends on the batch and running temp doesn't it? Theyall wander a bit, just like the 640/642, etc
    MAybe I got it wrong, I thought the new diodes were being hailed as the new 635 without the flashlight beam.

    Maybe Andy can clarify which diodes he's using. From the fact there are 3 diodes, I assumied it was the 'older' 638 diodes.
    Frikkin Lasers
    http://www.frikkinlasers.co.uk

    You are using Bonetti's defense against me, ah?

    I thought it fitting, considering the rocky terrain.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Wiltshire, UK
    Posts
    579

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by norty303 View Post

    Maybe Andy can clarify which diodes he's using
    To be honest I thought they were the 71/ 73. Andy?
    Squat that bug,

    One day I'll finish my build.
    https://www.facebook.com/Azteclasers?fref=ts

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    East Sussex, England
    Posts
    5,248

    Default

    I thought the 63133 from the stacking arrangements. How complicated the life of a laserist is!
    Frikkin Lasers
    http://www.frikkinlasers.co.uk

    You are using Bonetti's defense against me, ah?

    I thought it fitting, considering the rocky terrain.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •