Defqon 1 did it again!

[gabe]

Oh alright that's what you mean by shaking. nvm then thanks though!

[buffo]

I've seen that happen with people running Pangolin QM-2000's in remote .net boxes under Windows 7 without the networking patch that Pangolin released. Most notably at the 2010 ILDA conference. Basically the output "stutters" for a brief period. And yeah, it's unprofessional as hell. (Though it doesn't appear to be Pangolin's fault.)

If I remember correctly, the problem is caused by a change that Microsoft made to the networking stack in Windows 7; it broke a few previous applications, including some that .net uses. But there is a patch that should fix the problem. If anyone is having this problem, they should probably contact Pangolin directly for more details.

Adam

[masterpj]

yep and laserimage uses pangolin or dreamlaser (their own system)
They run windows xp as far as im aware though.

[Insanity]

I've seen that happen with people running Pangolin QM-2000's in remote .net boxes under Windows 7 without the networking patch that Pangolin released. Most notably at the 2010 ILDA conference. Basically the output "stutters" for a brief period. And yeah, it's unprofessional as hell. (Though it doesn't appear to be Pangolin's fault.)

If I remember correctly, the problem is caused by a change that Microsoft made to the networking stack in Windows 7; it broke a few previous applications, including some that .net uses. But there is a patch that should fix the problem. If anyone is having this problem, they should probably contact Pangolin directly for more details.

Adam

I see this a lot in LivePro on QM2000.Net, after a few reboots it clears up... Does it in the the preview window as well... I tried the patch with no luck, emailed Pangolin and they had no fix, put it down to my laptop, but I have tried several laptops with no luck... Never did get to the bottom of it... [/THREADJACK]

Amazing production at the festival by the way...



Mark

[danielbriggs]

I've seen that happen with people running Pangolin QM-2000's in remote .net boxes under Windows 7 without the networking patch that Pangolin released. Most notably at the 2010 ILDA conference. Basically the output "stutters" for a brief period. And yeah, it's unprofessional as hell. (Though it doesn't appear to be Pangolin's fault.)

If I remember correctly, the problem is caused by a change that Microsoft made to the networking stack in Windows 7; it broke a few previous applications, including some that .net uses. But there is a patch that should fix the problem. If anyone is having this problem, they should probably contact Pangolin directly for more details.

Adam

I've had it happen every now and then on Windows XP laptops.
Just a quick reboot fixes it; not a clue what it the cause is. The laptops have no A/V and are not on the net, so not sure what causes it to occur "randomly".
When it is going stuttery, CPU use on 1 core stays at 100% (from LP process).

[dave]

Yeah, same here, I usually go as far as rebooting all hardware, after the reboot all good It only seems to happen when more than 1 qm2000.net is attached tho

[Rizard]

And there was the aftermovie! And I have to say, they did it very well Like the way they put it all together.

[dzodzo]

And because I couldn't put 2 video's in my post here the other :

wicked... respect to the megalomaniacs behind this

[mccarrot]

Yeah, same here, I usually go as far as rebooting all hardware, after the reboot all good It only rseems to happen when more than 1 qm2000.net is attached tho

Same here, it looks like the higest Qm, in my case the pro start stuttering.
I have this issue with win XP, and got nothing to do with the network trotteling patch for vista (this register patch turns off the network throtteling/priority in win 7

Can you all check your network card? Are you all using realtec nic's? Do we have someone with a intel nic also withnesing this issue?

Shall we start a new topic toget to the bottom of this?

[mccarrot]

Can you all please your stuttering issues in this topic
http://www.photonlexicon.com/forums/...144#post236144

It would be great if we could get to,the bottom of this. Thanks!