Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 23

Thread: New way of cooling without a fan

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    211

    Default New way of cooling without a fan


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    1,438

    Default

    Very well worked out !

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    SoCal / San Salvador / NY
    Posts
    4,018

    Thumbs up

    ..Yet another bloke who will be retired on his own private-island before 50, sipping margaritas from his complimentary lamborghini-tumblers whilst jovially skimming the glowing-reviews of this things' global-successes on his platinum-iPad, and then be off skin-diving with his bronzed 20-something wife every afternoon.. *sigh*...
    ....and armed only with his trusty 21 Zorgawatt KTiOPO4...

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    denver,co
    Posts
    1,078

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dsli_jon View Post
    ..Yet another bloke who will be retired on his own private-island before 50, sipping margaritas from his complimentary lamborghini-tumblers whilst jovially skimming the glowing-reviews of this things' global-successes on his platinum-iPad, and then be off skin-diving with his bronzed 20-something wife every afternoon.. *sigh*...
    Sign me up!

    chad


    When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro.


  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    1,438

    Default

    OTOH if this thing relies on a 30µm airbearing, I can foresee it being not totally immune to dust.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Brooklyn NYC
    Posts
    840

    Default

    Hey Jon you missed one important thing

    " Developed by Jeff Koplow, a researcher at the US government’s Sandia National Laboratories,"
    what that means is that he will just get a pat on the back and his weekly salary
    hell they didnt even give him credit in the name " (which has also been dubbed the “Sandia Cooler”)"

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    SoCal / San Salvador / NY
    Posts
    4,018

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by VJ AIWAZ View Post
    ..he will just get a pat on the back and his weekly salary..
    Maybe. But ya, I hear-ya.. ie: poor, poor Nikola... ..and, his name even sounds-better / would prolly have-been more 'marketable'.. Kooled by a Koplow!

    ..but, I'm sure he'll *still* beat-us to living on a Jenneau off the Barrier Reef..
    ....and armed only with his trusty 21 Zorgawatt KTiOPO4...

  8. #8
    mixedgas's Avatar
    mixedgas is offline Creaky Old Award Winning Bastard Technologist
    Infinitus Excellentia Ion Laser Dominatus
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    A lab with some dripping water on the floor.
    Posts
    10,056

    Default

    Depends on his agreement with Sandia. Some times they let folks run with it and privatize. Unlike many other government agencies.

    Even at the State U I worked at, I had a chance at royalty payments, but only if the work was actually licensed after patent. Only in the form of a one time check at time of licensing. Those payments were not that shabby. I could also have got two to five grand for mere issuance of a patent. Considering the extra work to get one, that just about balances out the unpaid overtime needed.

    Usually the Fed, especially DOD, gets ALL of it. But lately they have caught on that their workers use patents to get other jobs and leave. So they now get the idea that a incentive is needed for retention.

    Steve

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    3,513

    Default

    OK,
    Wet blanket here. A heat sink needs at least a minimum cross section to conduct heat throughout its volume and this driver will push the mass up. The heat has to go somewhere and so the volume of air that it interacts with has to be maintained or the temperature must necessarily rise. It can't move air any faster than its surface speed and so the claim of VERY LOW speed is subjective. I see this as combining to produce vibration. Furthermore, I may have missed something here, but the interface between this moving object and a stationary heat generating source may be a serious choke point.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    211

    Default

    http://prod.sandia.gov/techlib/acces...010/100258.pdf

    Read thru the PDF and you see how it works...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •