Page 6 of 12 FirstFirst ... 2345678910 ... LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 114

Thread: Pangolin ScannerMax

  1. #51
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    DC/VA metro area, USA
    Posts
    554

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by -bart- View Post
    Does somebody have a clue why there are no class D scanner amps ?
    Afaik all scan amps are AB-ish. Is there a particular reason why this inefficient topology is chosen ?

    Or is it just that designing a good galvo driver is hard, designing a good class D amp is harder, designing a class D scanamp is hardest ?
    I'm going to go way out on a limb here and suggest that the time constants and phase delays inherent in the output filtering of such an amp would make the closed-circuit feedback loop response times too large to achieve fast scanner performance.

    But, I could be all wet there, never having measured any of that.

  2. #52
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    denver,co
    Posts
    1,078

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by -bart- View Post
    Does somebody have a clue why there are no class D scanner amps ?
    Afaik all scan amps are AB-ish. Is there a particular reason why this inefficient topology is chosen ?

    Or is it just that designing a good galvo driver is hard, designing a good class D amp is harder, designing a class D scanamp is hardest ?
    I have wondered the same thing. I am wondering about good H-bridge PWM design. I was able to get 100 hz out of nema 34 ac brushless servo. And i was moving it 30 deg... ( not for laser just testing the servo)

    chad


    When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro.


  3. #53
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    241

    Default

    Voila, here we go:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DatasheetFront.jpg 
Views:	66 
Size:	675.2 KB 
ID:	36851Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DatasheetBck.jpg 
Views:	66 
Size:	600.4 KB 
ID:	36852

    Looking good! I didn't ask for cost, since I didn't expect n answer. ;-)

  4. #54
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    DC/VA metro area, USA
    Posts
    554

    Default

    Well, color me wrong on my limb!

    After intensive googling, looks like Cambridge implemented at least one line of class D amps a few years ago:

    "LII PWM Drive: Generates power instead of heat; 90% efficient amplifier"

    http://www.camtech.com/index.php?opt...116&Itemid=183

  5. #55
    mixedgas's Avatar
    mixedgas is offline Creaky Old Award Winning Bastard Technologist
    Infinitus Excellentia Ion Laser Dominatus
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    A lab with some dripping water on the floor.
    Posts
    10,016

    Default

    Really good, good, scanner stuff is Class D + DSP..

    Look at Lightening IIs spex, 48V rail, optional water cooling, State-Space controller ie DSP.

    Next question, how thick is the mirror, how hard to replace etc...

    You may be seeing a need for a hotter, stiffer PSU rail with these. I was wrong on the heat guess, he went the other way and went low ohms.

    Steve

  6. #56
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    5,704

    Default

    If you want a better look at the ScannerMax specs docs they're here on the ScannerMax Website:



    Data Sheet here:

    http://celebritysites.com/beta/scannermax/pdf/SM5.pdf

    Andy have you got a pair? (of scanners that is!) (Thought I'd better clarify.)

  7. #57
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    3,513

    Default

    One problem I see (Bill are you listening?) is what they describe as the extended rotor/mirror back support. The image is a bit difficult, but if I read this right then the end of the shaft is cut on its side from an "O" to a "D" to reinforce the back of the mirror. Mechanically, this not a bad idea as this is the point of greatest stress and the added rotational mass near the axis is minimal. However, any change in mirror thickness to accommodate other mirror sizes will force the mirror's center of mass to move in or out and away from the rotational axis = vibration. Only by providing a variety of different shaft cuts or machining the mirror back at the interface to counter this (complex and unlikely) or constraining all mirrors to a uniform thickness can this be avoided. Single thickness mirrors will mean there will be a compromise in ultimate performance and a narrowing in the available choices.

    One suggestion, I am working on a modification for the Eye Magic scanners that reduces mirror mass by grinding down the back-outer edges of the mirror and converting the cross section of the mirror, viewed perpendicular to the shaft, from a rectangle to a trapezoid. This reduces the mass where it hurts the most and is unneeded. If the Pangolin engineer does the math, then this relatively straight forward operation will counter the radial shift of mass with a thicker mirror.

  8. #58
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    5,704

    Default

    Bill is at Photonics so unlikely to see this. Best email him with your suggestion.

  9. #59
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    241

    Default

    The mirror mounting is almost like at the CT's. The rotor has a slit where the mirror is supposed to be glued in. The back side of the mirror just has longer support to eliminate bending resonances of the mirror.
    I am not sure at this point if it helps a lot, depends on where these resonances are in frequency. When I am back at home next week I can do the calculation of the resonances with an FEM tool.

  10. #60
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    veenwouden
    Posts
    2,580

    Default

    Haha That is awesome. Andy thanks for posting this to inform the community. Walking arround on the Photonics event, keep an eye on what,s going on at PL and answer with Info. Thanks for that!!!!


    Interested in 6-12W RGB projectors with low divergence? Contact me by PM!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •