Will do. I'm not saying there is anything inherently wrong with the Eye Magics (aside from the customs delays that made getting the revison back a slightly more than three month process). I'm anxious to really try them side by side against some others.
I'm more pointing out that in a "real world, put two projectors on a table side by side", and run intense graphics/abstract shows from about 50 feet away, with the projection being about 12 feet by 12 feet square, I honestly see negligible difference in the image quality between my DT40wides and CT 6215's. At least not $1,000+ difference. Sort of like one Ferrari able to do 230 miles an hour but, for $50,000 more you can do 234 mph. We can do that at SELEM too if you want. (The projector test...regrettably not the Ferrari test. )
What Jon seemed to insinuate is that I should be expecting "rock star" performance increases with the Eye Magics versus the chinese DT's and, in my experience thus far, I just haven't seen it between DT's and Cambridge which, is supposed to be the creme de la creme. Jon projects hundreds of yards and uses a lot more power so, I can see him feeling that way. I just don't know that for most people purposes it's worth an extra grand.