Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 47

Thread: Laser nightlights and assorted stupidity

  1. #31
    gashead's Avatar
    gashead is offline Admin Verified: Best Accent Ever(Tm)
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Burntisland, Scotland
    Posts
    899

    Default

    This makes me sad...

    He's received all this money and *if* he goes into production.. surely the product will be banned ?

    The whole thing seems to be full of marketing speak and lacking in factuality.

    The thing that *REALLY* concerns me is it's being marketed as a nightlight for use in kids bedrooms - this is the kind of product that my Son would love.. he'd be up all night playing in the beams.. let's just hope a 3 year old doesn't look directly into one!

    I mean, is this guy serious ?? is he that much of an idiot that he thinks the claims he makes (regarding safety) stand ??

    I'm guessing the product is manufactured in (or will be) China and drop shipped..

    People really do just think Laser is "just a light" don't they. *sigh*
    "The horizon leans forward offering you space, to place New steps of change"

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Detroit, USA
    Posts
    558

    Default

    I'm sure the guy knew EXACTLY was he was doing & selling, and he just made half a million dollars!! Hell, if he's REALLY smart, he will never spend a dime having them manufactured & blame the FDA or some shit.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    the hills
    Posts
    983

    Default

    It would be nice if someone, in a LSO type position (for instance), could get their hands on one of these then prove it unsafe (if it ever goes to market). If the CDRH couldn't take care of it, I bet it would be of extreme interest to the CPSC (which loves protecting us from ourselves and taking companies down the tubes along with their product).

    If that could happen before he skips the country with the money.... Yeah, well...

    Hummmm, think I'll email the CPSC right now. Won't y'all join me?

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    SoCal / San Salvador / NY
    Posts
    4,018

    Default

    ..Reportedly, he has-someone 'working on' helping make this compliant (..or, at least, getting the FDA to *think* it is.. ), and - again, it's not like this thing is 'a pound of C-4 in a soccer-ball', but.. Just (imo) terrible-idea to not have some sort of 'proximity-interlock', or.. some-way to prevent kids from sticking this thing in their / each-others' / their pets eyeballs, at point-blank, while lit, since - unlike 'similar products' out there on the market (ie: Blisslights, all the 'ChiCo. rip-off disco-vomit-lite versions of this concept..) *this* thing is purported - and shown - to be a *bedside, face-kissingly-safe* product! What - do we think kids are not gonna get access / listen to Mommy and Daddy saying '..now, Janey, don't put this thing closer tham 70mm to your eyes, ok, honey?..' >_<

    .. I.. just don't get how the thing is gonna both be safe / compliant and not-disappointing as heck, once people get it and.. '..well, it' don't look like the pik-ture!!!' Then again.. if it either never makes it to-market, OR, if he does get them 'approved' / ships, etc, and people realize they've been (...at the very-least, misled / poorly-educated...)... 7,367 *is* quite a lot of 'torches and pitchforks'...

    Ok, I'll shut up, now..
    j
    ....and armed only with his trusty 21 Zorgawatt KTiOPO4...

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    1,126

    Default

    results are in, the raw diode laser outputs 25mw before it comes out the aperture of the firefly, once it comes out it is 13.5mw and an inch away because of the split i cant get more than 4mw total power. the hottest beam is 2.4 mw. I am not praising it but it is a lot better than I thought it would be. I am not a fan of marketing this to kids for nightlights is my main issue

    it actually looks a lot brighter than its power. i had to get another meter to check to make sure it was correct

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    4,382

    Default

    Well at least no kids are gonna get blinded, I guess .. still, staring into a single 2.4mW beam for even a second will cause damage to the retina I would be fairly sure ..

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    2,478

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dream beamz View Post
    results are in, the raw diode laser outputs 25mw before it comes out the aperture of the firefly, once it comes out it is 13.5mw and an inch away because of the split i cant get more than 4mw total power. the hottest beam is 2.4 mw. I am not praising it but it is a lot better than I thought it would be. I am not a fan of marketing this to kids for nightlights is my main issue

    it actually looks a lot brighter than its power. i had to get another meter to check to make sure it was correct
    Whatever it is, you totally had me on 'aperture of the firefly'.

    EDIT: Never mind, it sounded a lot cooler than it actually is, maybe. Sounds like it can't be safely built without making it more expensive than people will pay for.
    Last edited by The_Doctor; 02-21-2014 at 21:33.

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    SoCal / San Salvador / NY
    Posts
    4,018

    Default

    Hey G -

    Quote Originally Posted by dream beamz View Post
    results are in...an inch away ... i cant get more than 4mw total power. the hottest beam is 2.4 mw...
    Thanks for the 'homewerk' / posting results.. Just curious:

    - How's the on-product 'labeling' / documentation? Does it (..at least try..) to 'scare the crap out of the parents', so there might be a chance that they won't just 'hand these to their kids' / use for toddlers? (..among those parents that bother to *read*, that-is..

    - What size 'aperture' are you using, when you measured the 13.5mW, at-aperture? At least 10-14mm? (..figuring 'dark-adjusted' pupils, since these are "nightlights" for presumably dark bedrooms..) Curious, since there is no 'proximity-interlock', there's nothing to prevent kids from sticking this thing directly on / at the eye, and eyelashes are usually far-less than 'an inch' long, so.. that means the unfettered *potential* is 13.5mW of 450nm in kids' eyeballs.. Way to go, 'Richard'..

    ..and to all those that will say 'you're just being a fearmongering nanny', sorry, I reject that, on the basis that, again, there's no 'proximity-interlock' - I am sure they could have easily designed something, ie: perhaps an IR-sensor-based interlock, tuned so that the output would 'dim', when sensing body-heat, within, say 2', and 'increase attenuation' - right down to zero-output - when you / a kid got within 1'... *THAT* would make me, for one, feel a lot better.. Really - what *need* is there for it to 'remain lit', when you have it at point-blank??.. So-what if it had a 'soft-start', once you 'pressed ON', etc?? Walk away, and behold, there's yer nightlite, working as-advertised...

    ..Sure, you'd have to 'field a few calls' from the idiots that would (not-having read the documentation..) call up, yelling '..it don't work, dangbummit!!!' etc, but.. Aside from that, I'd think educated / informed parents would be thrilled to learn that the creators thought of such 'intelligent safety', and would be more than happy to pay the few extra-bux it would've cost...

    ..but, you know how it is, these days.. Greed-driven profit, over all.. Richard, may you fulfill *all* your wildest $$-dreams off sales of this thing, and - once some little Richie Rich baby does-get eye-damage from one of these stupidly-designed hurtballs - may all the purchasing-Parents unite and sue every hair off your rankid body.


    bah...
    ....and armed only with his trusty 21 Zorgawatt KTiOPO4...

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Baltimore, MD
    Posts
    69

    Default

    I ran across someone with one of these FireFly units so I tested it with my power meter (20C-A-1-Y head). After running for about 5 minutes it reported 17mW.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	firefly.jpg 
Views:	33 
Size:	1.65 MB 
ID:	42834

    Please note that I have never had my power meter calibrated.

    Edit: Here's the warning label.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	firefly2.jpg 
Views:	37 
Size:	1.71 MB 
ID:	42835
    Last edited by macpod; 04-09-2014 at 17:32.

  10. #40
    mixedgas's Avatar
    mixedgas is offline Creaky Old Award Winning Bastard Technologist
    Infinitus Excellentia Ion Laser Dominatus
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    A lab with some dripping water on the floor.
    Posts
    9,905

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stiffler View Post
    I still can't believe how much money this project has raised ($398,330), people are idiots!!!
    Check out his patents some time, be afraid, be very afraid.

    Steve
    Qui habet Christos, habet Vitam!
    I should have rented the space under my name for advertising.
    When I still could have...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •