Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 44

Thread: FS: Rubicon Laser Power Meters

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Tampa Florida
    Posts
    502

    Default

    Nah, just press one at a time to see which one is the ejection seat!
    Phil Bergeron( AKA 142laser)

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    80

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lasersbee View Post
    wouldn't it make some sense to identify the 4 buttons on
    your enclosure?
    Thanks for the suggestion, I will look into that.

    The UI is very intuitive and the function of each button is clear after a few minutes of use. The function of the four buttons (select, up, down, function) is detailed in the Rubicon users manual.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Mesa, AZ
    Posts
    1,279

    Default

    This looks like a very well made and professional quality meter. Top of my list for the next one I buy.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    5,704

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by steviobee View Post
    Are these 'safe' enough for reliable audience scanning evaluations? Am looking into my options at the moment...
    The trouble you're going to have is finding a suitable head to take the measurement as I believe the Ophir 20C-A won't cut it for direct MPE measurement which is most people's head of choice as they're relatively cheaply available. For a straight power measurement, the Ophir is fine.

    The minimum measurable power on the 20C-A is 20mw with an accuracy of +/- 3% (http://www.ophiropt.com/laser/pdf/20...-A_20C-UAU.pdf), which equates to 19.4mw in the more sensitive direction, by my maths.

    With a 12mm diameter sensor you have a sensor area of 113mm 2.

    So that's a 19.4mw measurement spread over 113mm 2.

    113/100 x 19.4 = 21.9mw over 100mm 2 (ie. 1cm 2 = 10x10mm)

    I'm sure my maths is probably wrong here so no doubt someone will jump on this and correct it, but I make the minimum measurable power density on the 20C-A sensor to be 21.9mw cm 2 - that's a 19.4mw reading on the 12mm aperture.

    As MPE is 10mw cm2, its only suitable for laser power measurement not MPE measurement.

    You need a sensor with a lower minimum power measurement capability.

    This doesn't in any way reflect on the meter of course which is probably capable of MPE measurements when paired with a suitable sensor.
    Last edited by White-Light; 07-28-2013 at 01:04.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    80

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by White-Light View Post
    The trouble you're going to have is finding a suitable head to take the measurement as I believe the Ophir 20C-A won't cut it for direct MPE measurement which is most people's head of choice as they're relatively cheaply available.

    The minimum measurable power on the 20C-A is 20mw with an accuracy of +/- 3% (http://www.ophiropt.com/laser/pdf/20...-A_20C-UAU.pdf), which equates to 19.4mw in the more sensitive direction, by my maths.

    With a 12mm diameter sensor you have a sensor area of 113mm 2.

    So that's a 19.4mw measurement spread over 113mm 2.

    113/100 x 19.4 = 21.9mw over 100mm 2 (ie. 1cm 2 = 10x10mm)

    I'm sure my maths is probably wrong here so no doubt someone will jump on this and correct it, but I make the minimum measurable power density on the 20C-A sensor to be 21.9mw cm 2 - that's a 19.4mw reading on the 12mm aperture.

    As MPE is 10mw cm2, its only suitable for laser power measurement not MPE measurement.

    You need a sensor with a lower minimum power measurement capability.

    This doesn't in any way reflect on the meter of course which is probably capable of MPE measurements when paired with a suitable sensor.
    Thanks for the math! I stand corrected
    I did not know MPE was calculated in that way.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    5,704

    Default

    I'm not saying it is. I'm sure I'm probably wrong and someone who's done the safety course, will correct me.

    All I'm saying as a few people have mentioned the Ophir head is that I don't believe its suitable for use with any meter as a direct MPE head for use with the simple method, because I believe the minimum power density it can measure is too high. So I believe its more suited to straight power measurements or MPE where you measure the power at the aperture and then calculate the long way around using divergence etc.

    If anyone buying your meter wants to use it specifically for direct MPE measurement using the simple method, then they probably need to pair it with a head which can measure below 20mw minimum.

    It is a very nice meter btw and paired with the right head will be a great purchase.

    I'd certainly buy one for power measurement and with a different head for MPE.
    Last edited by White-Light; 08-07-2013 at 01:14.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    west sussex uk
    Posts
    2,280

    Default

    Question : can the firmware be modded to have more ranges ? Ie 5to10w and 10to20w
    As a heatsinked 20C-A head can measure these powers
    When God said “Let there be light” he surely must have meant perfectly coherent light.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    80

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by badger1666 View Post
    Question : can the firmware be modded to have more ranges ? Ie 5to10w and 10to20w
    As a heatsinked 20C-A head can measure these powers
    Sending you a PM about this

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    64

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ARGLaser View Post
    Sending you a PM about this
    Could you please forward me these instructions as well? I have an ophir 150-a-.3 that needs heating above 5w. I'm also confused at to max power to be read. I can supply 24v max and at .3 v/w I can't hit the 150.
    Thanka

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Miami, FL
    Posts
    3,590

    Default

    does the version without the sensor come with the cable to go to the sensor?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •