Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 47

Thread: fog/haze without a fogging machine?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Under a rock in Cambridge UK
    Posts
    1,353

    Default

    Pictures with lots of detail hide the damage, but when you take a light coloured background, the damage becomes clear... Look inside the red rectangle...

    Be warned, lasers can do the same damage to video projectors and more importantly eyes...

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	ccd.jpg 
Views:	54 
Size:	59.6 KB 
ID:	41769

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Under a rock in Cambridge UK
    Posts
    1,353

    Default

    Yes, assuming you are using Pangolin software for control... If you are, you can set a Beam Attenuation Map to mask out that area of the scanfield, then no laser will hit the lens... That's what we do at gigs to protect video projectors. Basically, stick the lens cap on, turn laser on at low power, draw a circle on the lens cap and then set the BAM to zero output for that area...

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    My momentum is too precisely determined :S
    Posts
    1,777

    Default

    In LSX, that feature is called "Safety Zones" in the DAC settings.

    But for a DMX or SD card-based laser... don't put the camera in the beam path?

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    38.9235N -89.9345W
    Posts
    21

    Default

    What not to do:

    Circa 1976, bunch of teenagers in a band covering the the first few tracks from Dark Side of the Moon. Had a 'light show', a dangerous switch/dimmer contraption that managed four towers each with 8 150w flood lamps of different colors, switchable/dimmable by color, by tower front/back, left/right, etc. Needed fog effects for Pink Floyd tunes. Problem: Teenagers in 1977 can't afford fog machine. Can afford fog juice. One member of the group knows dad has propane fired bug fogger. Idea: put fog juice in bug fogger, problem solved. Kinda. New problem: when warming up the 'fog machine' prior to use it's too easy to to get it a little too hot and fog juice ignites. Solution, borrow fire extinguisher from same dad 'just in case'.

    Now same band is playing in a big 'battle of the bands' and, fog is cued and everything seems to be going well ... until fogger being shot thru drum kit turns into flame thrower (band doesn't know this as it's going on behind them. Drummer does but, being a drummer, keeps playing as the show must go on). Fog operator somehow has presence of mind to kill the fogger and fire the (CO2) fire extinguisher thru the drum kit putting out the burning shag carpet on the homemade drum risers (I said it was the 70s). Set ends while crowd goes nuts.

    Mark Klose from KSHE radio is ecstatic, "Guys, that was the coolest thing I've ever seen! How did you do that?" We'd no clue what he'd seen, which was described as at first a billowing cloud of smoke coming out of the drum set, which was then engulfed by a ball of flame followed by perfect dry ice fog that poured out over the stage for "Breathe reprise". As the band played on . . .

    Ask me sometime how I know that if a little flash powder is good, then a lot is not better.
    Last edited by AnAnonymousParty; 01-10-2014 at 16:36.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    West Sussex
    Posts
    1,279

    Default

    Sometimes it seems that these often dangerous errors are the making of people or the beginning of new trends having inspired others (hopefully a bit safer)!

    It sounds like you've been to the party, AnAnonymousParty

    Keith

    Quote Originally Posted by AnAnonymousParty View Post
    What not to do:

    Circa 1976, bunch of teenagers in a band covering the the first few tracks from Dark Side of the Moon. Had a 'light show', a dangerous switch/dimmer contraption that managed four towers each with 8 150w flood lamps of different colors, switchable/dimmable by color, by tower front/back, left/right, etc. Needed fog effects for Pink Floyd tunes. Problem: Teenagers in 1977 can't afford fog machine. Can afford fog juice. One member of the group knows dad has propane fired bug fogger. Idea: put fog juice in bug fogger, problem solved. Kinda. New problem: when warming up the 'fog machine' prior to use it's too easy to to get it a little too hot and fog juice ignites. Solution, borrow fire extinguisher from same dad 'just in case'.

    Now same band is playing in a big 'battle of the bands' and, fog is cued and everything seems to be going well ... until fogger being shot thru drum kit turns into flame thrower (band doesn't know this as it's going on behind them, drummer does but, being a drummer keeps playing as the show must go on). Fog operator somehow has presence of mind to kill the fogger and fire the (CO2) fire extinguisher thru the drum kit putting out the burning shag carpet on the homemade drum risers (I said it was the 70s). Set ends while crowd goes nuts.

    Mark Klose from KSHE radio is ecstatic, "Guys, that was the coolest thing I've ever seen! How did you do that?" We'd no clue what he'd seen, which was described as at first a billowing cloud of smoke coming out of the drum set, which was then engulfed by a ball of flame followed by perfect dry ice fog that billowed out over the stage for "Breathe reprise". As the band played on . . .

    Ask me sometime how I know that if a little flash powder is good, then a lot is not better.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Israel
    Posts
    78

    Default

    Get a little piece of dry ice, put it in hot water and use a small fan to spread the clean safe haze.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    west sussex uk
    Posts
    2,280

    Default

    Please don't get tempted to use the fog in a can , you will regret it.
    It's awfull stuff ,it will leave everything in the room oily and sticky , a noob mistake I made years ago
    When God said “Let there be light” he surely must have meant perfectly coherent light.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    255

    Default

    Overheating glycerol in a frying pan can produce formaldehyde, which is quite toxic, especially to the eyes. Just my 2 cents.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    2,478

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fearless View Post
    Overheating glycerol in a frying pan can produce formaldehyde, which is quite toxic, especially to the eyes. Just my 2 cents.
    Fog fluids are usually polyethylene glycol solutions in water, not glycerine but I take your point. None of these fluids should be overheated. Formaldehyde has a 'characteristic pungent, irritating odor' as stated on Wikipedia. Think 'hospital smell' and you'll be ready the moment it becomes detectable at all, it's very familiar to nearly everyone.

    Anyway, staying with glycol fluid is the way to go, and I described how hot to make the frying pan. Hot enough to make water droplets run across it as beads, instead of easily spreading and hissing to steam immediately, BUT NO HOTTER. Actually you get a bit of leeway but if it starts to smell like a soldering iron getting hot, it's too hot. If the glycol coming off makes clean white fog leaving no deposits, and the smell is that usual heavy sweet smell, you're in business. No matter what you do, there should be some room ventilation.

    If it is done as I describe it, the result is extremely similar to a proper fog machine, the only thing lacking is a directional nozzle, and convenience, and safety (which is still no worse than any electric cooker). Some people might say that you get less fog per drop of fog fluid, but watch it happen, it all becomes fog. Any difference in efficiency is very marginal, as you'll find out very fast if you try to drop too much in the pan! The greatest risk is reducing visibility to zero while you're standing next to a hot cooker hob.

    EDIT:
    Nice page about fog fluids here:
    http://www.bigclive.com/smoke.htm
    Last edited by The_Doctor; 01-13-2014 at 14:34.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    luton
    Posts
    58

    Default

    if you have access to a temperature probe / infra-red temperature gun, the typical optimal smoke machine vaporising temperature varies from 220 deg. Celsius for quick dispersing fluids through to around 325deg. Celsius for long hang fluids. both applicable to glycol only.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •