Testing at all stages for colour and power output to 'bin' them according to findings is expensive, and is another way of saying that there isn't as much control at the time of making as they would like. If Cree really manage to get specified outputs with less testing, and without customer complaints, that's a strength, not a weakness.
Thanks for the tip of the vulnerability of the Cree dome lens. Always nice to have advance warning. I think most people who deal with laser diodes and the like are used to having to treat emitters gently though. Also, I have a Cree XR-E based torch that I've dropped from greater than one metre onto concrete with no ill effect, so they're not all that vulnerable.
I've already paid for three XR-E's and I'm using the small 'Rocket' beam shaper made in Finland, specially for those lamps. The 4° beam type. I'm just playing around, getting parts that will at least most likely be highly useful to me even if they don't do exactly what I hope and expect.
I saw that Rebel LED chip on sale, and considered buying. Should I? It looked cool, but I think I outspent my current budget for fun stuffs. Assuming I can stretch further, I want two of those Q5's. I'm not a member of CPF though and don't want to sign up to another forum with another need to remember name/pass just to get two of those. If someone can help me directly, please let me know.
Re Luxeons, I intend to try those too at some point, though I may now wait for these new emitters. I tried Cree first because it was somewhere to start (and I like the name), and the efficiency of the XR-E is definitely better than the Luxeon K2. Can't argue with basic data sheet specs, unless you have good technical proof that they are wrong.
PS. LOL, at 'Excrelamp'. Master of the Dodgy Pun.Anyone who thinks that Americans don't understand puns (many of us Brits think this) is wrong. I know a Texan who can play puns like a top poker player, when he's on form anyway. And when he's not they're even more unsubtle than English end-of-pier humour.