no... you continue to be wrong and you continue to just project.
i have nothing against laserboy waves or waves in general. while they offer some functionality in the laser field for show playback and recording in very limited circumstances, they are stupid for laser show creation and editing.
laser show software and laser consoles do not export waves (unlike your claim). some laser show software will import waves for conversion into a much better format (ilda) but not for native playback and editing.
you completely deflect in order to push your misguided point.

Originally Posted by
james
You are not making the connection because you don't want to.
It's not wav that you have an issue with. It's LaserBoy wav.
No. I'm trying to point out that the ability to record any laser signals to a much better resolution than can be detected in the display exists, has been around for a very long time and is always being improved. There are devices available now that can do 32-bit at 384KHz. I think you can find a sweet spot somewhere in that range. That recording is going to be a multichannel data stream with the samples interleaved together. There's a name for that...... Ummm..... Oh yeah! It's a WAVE!!!
Something else that should be of interest to you is that there is no limit to the number of points (samples) per frame in a wave. In ilda, there is a limit of 65535. That might seem like a huge number, but for those very detailed long exposures you do on phosphorescent material or blue print paper, this is not an unusual number at all.
You could store any number of consecutive frames in a wave and get them all back in frames.
suppose you're thinkin' about a plate o' shrimp. Suddenly someone'll say, like, plate, or shrimp, or plate o' shrimp out of the blue, no explanation. No point in lookin' for one, either. It's all part of a cosmic unconciousness.