This is my first post on this forum but I’ve been a longtime grateful lurker.
Anyway, I was wanting to know what effect a secondary transparent medium (such as projecting a quality 5w RGB FB4/ILDA fully built out of box laser’s beam through a window on a waterproof housing) has on the clarity/sharpness/output/etc of the light’s final rendering when it reaches its destination of focus (wall/screen/etc) .
[** Let’s put heat issues aside and just address the optical constraints of adding a second occlusive barrier through which a diode’s beam would need to pass before reaching its final intended point of focus, such as a wall or screen.]
I am a laser hobbyist and enjoy assembling my own show lasers to accompany my Eurorack music performances. But I am far from an engineer and even further from a physicist. And the reason why I ask this question is because there must be some problem with adding a second “transparent” solid medium to a beam’s path or I would expect to see untold numbers of waterproof laser and DMX moving head transparent housings for sale on Amazon/ebay. I believe that one of Pangolin’s brands offers a true weatherproof housing (as opposed to a cheap vinyl rain cover) for its lasers. But the catch is the price. Not only is the price of the housing more expensive than my Prius, the laser designed to fit into this custom housing costs more than i probably earn in a year.
Sorry for the long post (and please comment if I have made my post too wordy as I want to learn proper Photonlexicon forum etiquette).
ALSO, if you know this additional answer, can you please let me know if the same constraints that inhibit the ability to properly render the final output of a laser that is placed in a housing ALSO APPLY TO VIDEO PROJECTORS AND DMX MOVING HEADS?
Thanks so much for any insight you are willing to share 🙏
THE FALLING GIRL