Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 68

Thread: All Things LaserBoy

  1. #21
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    nerdtown, USA
    Posts
    1,165

    Default

    There are actually some pretty good reasons not to use a soundcard as a DAC. One of them is that it's actually really easy and cheap to build something like the Pangolin FB3 (which actually has < $100 of parts on it) these days. I daresay one could get all the functionality of that with just a single AVR processor, one of the FTDI USB chips, some SPI DACs (about $1 a pop) and a few connectors... and in fact, I have such a device on my bench right now. PCB layouts and schematics will follow when I've resurrected my poor abused scanners (software testing is bad for scanners ) and fixed it all up. I haven't implemented DMX512 yet because, personally, I think DMX512 control is going to go the way of the dinosaur; USB all the way, yo.

    On another note, seriously, and no kidding: James, you HAVE to put a decent GUI on that thing. It's by far the most capable open source laser software. Please, please, please, put a WIMP interface on it. Please. That should be your main focus now. Not getting your name put on things you didn't design.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Akron, Ohio USA
    Posts
    1,754

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by heroic View Post
    There are actually some pretty good reasons not to use a soundcard as a DAC.

    On another note, seriously, and no kidding: James, you HAVE to put a decent GUI on that thing. It's by far the most capable open source laser software. Please, please, please, put a WIMP interface on it. Please. That should be your main focus now. Not getting your name put on things you didn't design.
    A clear horizon with a light of possibility on it is always a great motivating factor for anyone. Even if a budding laserist never uses a hand modified sound card, it still stands as an example to the world that it can be done with commonly available, generic stuff. It is proof that the concept is all that matters.

    No, I did not design the sound card. Never claimed to have.

    What!? I just cleaned the GUI off my thing!

    ....Yeah, I know.

    James.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Akron, Ohio USA
    Posts
    1,754

    Talking

    Here it is:
    Let's put this on the circuit board.

    "dchammonds"
    "James Lehman"
    "drlava"
    "LaserBoy"
    "photonlexicon.com"

    ...All in the same sized font in no particular order on the silk screened surface.

    And nothing else but the parts identifications.

    Other than that. I do not endorse it, will not support it or recognize it's existence.

    That's my final word. For real.

    James.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    2,342

    Default

    Interesting discussions here.. As James has said, (with a little back and forth) we have completed a simple PCB layout geared toward low cost, flexibility, and simplicity. The boards have been made and are on their way to me, all this was done to be finished in time for SELEM.
    My opinion is that it could be called the AudioDac 1, as that doesn't suggest it's tied to any particular software (because it's not). Either that, or LaserBoy could become a brand name, necessitating that the software be called the LaserBoy *something*. (Vector Studio?)

    There are actually some pretty good reasons not to use a soundcard as a DAC. One of them is that it's actually really easy and cheap to build something like the Pangolin FB3 (which actually has < $100 of parts on it) these days. I daresay one could get all the functionality of that with just a single AVR processor, one of the FTDI USB chips, some SPI DACs (about $1 a pop) and a few connectors... and in fact, I have such a device on my bench right now. PCB layouts and schematics will follow when I've resurrected my poor abused scanners (software testing is bad for scanners ) and fixed it all up.
    Very interesting

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Akron, Ohio USA
    Posts
    1,754

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by drlava View Post
    My opinion is that it could be called the AudioDac 1, as that doesn't suggest it's tied to any particular software (because it's not). Either that, or LaserBoy could become a brand name, necessitating that the software be called the LaserBoy *something*. (Vector Studio?)
    I asked you to help me lay it out in a PC board CAD program so we could get it done. I knew you had already done boards, so I knew you could do it. I also knew you have a vested interest in the existence of such a thing because of your driver. Dean designed it. I laid it out and routed it. You put it up in OR-CAD. What you did was a service. You had nothing to do with the design or concept. That all existed well before you started writing your driver; which DOES tie directly to it; just as my LaserBoy application DOES and Dean's LaserWave application that no one else has ever seen DOES. As a matter of fact you developed your driver using a LaserBoy correction amp that I made with my own hands. I tried to get that point across to you in PMs and phone calls. Apparently you didn't get it. Your opinion was never needed.


    James.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    nerdtown, USA
    Posts
    1,165

    Default

    Lads,

    Steve Jobs had it right:

    Real Artists Ship

    if you don't stop arguing and just kick this thing out the door, you're not going anywhere.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    2,342

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by James Lehman View Post
    Your opinion was never needed.


    James.
    :x I thought this was an open thread. I'm a PL member, just trying to help.


    Don't worry, it IS coming out the door, this discussion has not slowed Fedex down at all.
    Last edited by drlava; 07-28-2008 at 13:56.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Pflugerville, TX, USA
    Posts
    1,977

    Default

    If I am not mistaken, I was the first to mention adding balanced outputs to the circuit. And the way I see it is you can name something by adding a few components to a sound card then I can also rename the whole shebang by adding my components to that. So, once the balanced output thingies are added I want to make sure that it is called the "LaserMAN+ Super #1 DAC". Make sure the MAN is capatilized. I will go ahead and modify my Spaghetti software so that is says "LaserMAN+ Super #1 DAC" on the scanner settings form.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails LaserMAN.jpg  

    Last edited by carmangary; 07-28-2008 at 13:56.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1

    Default Just a note...

    Using a computers sound output to drive laser scanners has been going on since at least the late 80's. Bill Benner at Pangolin designed circuits and modifications that had to be done to the Amiga computer in order to run Pangolin's software. Back then it was the same as today- you had to DC couple the sound by bypassing capacitors, and you had to make the signal bi-polar. Bill Benner is an electonics and control systems genius- I've been amazed by his work!

    Now then, this does not and should not take away from the fact that Laserboy is cool!!!

    Regards,
    Steve

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Toronto Canada
    Posts
    1,120

    Default

    Like I said before I love Laserboy DXF to ILDA ability. I don't really need anything else. I would be more glad to see a multiformat converter. But this is just me.
    I hired an Italian guy to do my wires. Now they look like spaghetti!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •