Page 7 of 9 FirstFirst ... 3456789 LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 85

Thread: The perfect white balance - feedback requested

  1. #61
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Stockholm, Sweden
    Posts
    799

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by White-Light View Post
    Working for me although it doesn't appear in programmes list or as an icon - you have to find it where you downloaded it. I moved my copy to the desktop.

    2 pieces of feedback:

    1. It would be useful to have a clear button for the luminance map as once you've tried 2 or 3 different mixes it becomes very hard to know which is which and you need to restart the program to clear the map.

    2. It would be useful if it would zoom to full screen as the colour gradients on the map are quite hard to view at current size.
    Thanks for your comments. Regarding the first point; the plot is actually cleared between every refresh in the code. Obviously this doesn't work, so it's in fact a bug. I'll take another look at the code, but I suspect I will either have to add some ugly code or rewrite the callback function.

    As for your second point, the gradient is not very accurate, but I can see how a zoom could be beneficial at times. I'll see if it's easy to add such a feature.

  2. #62
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Central Florida
    Posts
    7,067

    Thumbs up

    I got the new version to work on my old opteron 175 running XP. Thanks!

    For point 1, couldn't you just reinitialize the graph each time "update" is pressed?

  3. #63
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Stockholm, Sweden
    Posts
    799

    Default

    I have a solution to the plot clearing problem, somewhat ugly... but it works and is very simple (single line of code). As I see it there are three options for implementing it:

    1. Clear every time update is pressed.
    2. Add a clear button and don't clear when update is pressed.
    3. Add a check box and clear on update when it is checked.

    So what do you think is best?

  4. #64
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Central Florida
    Posts
    7,067

    Lightbulb

    Hey, whatever is simplest for you.

  5. #65
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    5,704

    Default

    For me Option 1 seems best but like Allthatwhichis said, what ever is easiest for you Tocket.

    Its a great little programme and much appreciated. I'm sure its going to make laser power choice a lot easier for everyone.

  6. #66
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Stockholm, Sweden
    Posts
    799

    Default

    New version uploaded. I went with option 3, as I find it is sometimes useful to not clear the graph when adding new points (comparing 2 different setups).

    I can unfortunately not find a way to add zoom functionality. I did make one small other change now though; the window is slightly larger.

    The next change is probably making the gradient more accurate.

  7. #67
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    5,704

    Default

    I can't run the new version Tocket.

    I'm getting the original error message despite having Matlab installed.

  8. #68
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Stockholm, Sweden
    Posts
    799

    Default

    Funny... I wouldn't put it past me to have uploaded the wrong file again, but this seems to be the correct one. I recompiled it and it seems to work on all of my 3 computers now. I did not make any changes to the code, but instead found that crossing your fingers and standing on one leg while pushing the compile button is more likely to produce a working executable. The console window will spit out a couple of hundred warnings when it starts now instead, but it works fine. That even happens to me in matlab sometimes, for no apparent reason.

    Anyway, a new "working" version has been uploaded.

  9. #69
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    5,704

    Default

    Still can't get it to run.

    If a re-instate the original file from out of the recycle bin, the original chroma runs, albeit it takes like 20 seconds to initialise (I have a very fast pc - C2D 6600+ Overclocked + 4GB RAM + RAID Array) so this is strange in itself.

    If I delete the original chroma to recycle then try to install the latest Croma I get the original .dll can't be found error.

    Could it be something to do with the package associating itself with the original file?

  10. #70
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Stockholm, Sweden
    Posts
    799

    Default

    What's the size of the file you're trying to run? Or better yet, the MD5 checksum? It should be:
    38b6d7bb2f07b7aa0e3df803919bf06d Chroma.exe
    7ec36aec97fc2d67961a597fe2514d53 Chroma_pkg.exe

    I found that my browser cached the old version, so when I thought I was downloading a new version I was in fact just running the old again.

    It does take a while to start the program, because it has to load MCR.

    EDIT: nevermind, tried it on a fourth computer, and it doesn't work. This is stupid... I'll take another look at it when I get home, but it must be some bug with the compiler.
    Last edited by tocket; 04-01-2009 at 03:19.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •