RGBV laser

[White-Light]

Yeah soundclick is the easyest way to for me to get it up. But that would be the easiest way to get them. Some of them are not HQ mainly because I didnt have the suff to clean them and put them in HQ, but all the new ones are in 192Mp3, But I also run them throw a sound HD engine, which takes hours for each song.... but the end is the best I can get!!
I need to update my sound click.
to date I have 180 songs, with more in the works

djmatt

Use 320kbs Matt you'll notice the difference provided the original is 320 of course. (CD is 192 BTW, 320 is studio).

www.djdownload.com is your friend for buying 320kbs studio quality dance music.

[djmatt]

Use 320kbs Matt you'll notice the difference provided the original is 320 of course. (CD is 192 BTW, 320 is studio).

www.djdownload.com is your friend for buying 320kbs studio quality dance music.

Ah this is true!! The oringinals are in a huge wave file,and I convert them to MP3. Im not sure if 320kbs is surported by soundclick,but I can always try it!!
Cool!! Ill have to check that out!


djmatt

[allthatwhichis]

I keep waiting for this Test Pattern to become engraved on my window shade. Has anyone left lasting impressions on their walls, curtains, doors, etc.? Cat

Even with my 1W RGB i do not score any walls or blinds. I have scortched the leather chair in a few spots and am sure a full beam would burn some blinds but the walls are all good... I would actually have him point it away from the blinds just incase they accidently get opened and his creation get shared with the neighborhood.

[heroic]

(CD is 192 BTW, 320 is studio).

Uh, no it's not.

CD is uncompressed- 16-bit 44.1 kHz stereo linear.

Most studios used 96 kHz 24-bit linear but since storage got so cheap an increasing number are moving to 192 kHz.

None of this has any bearing on the number of kilobits per second of MPEG layer 3 you're using, because neither CD nor studio use that. It's a lossy format and so it is unsuitable for studio use (the generation loss is perceptible even at 320 kbits/sec). CD predates MPEG, and in fact does not use any form of data compression.

[djmatt]

Even with my 1W RGB i do not score any walls or blinds. I have scortched the leather chair in a few spots and am sure a full beam would burn some blinds but the walls are all good... I would actually have him point it away from the blinds just incase they accidently get opened and his creation get shared with the neighborhood.

And thats a sweet RGB by the way!!! Yeah the only thing I ve burned so far is hands trying to aline stuff,oh and a shirt! I think I need to do that anyway,its in the middle of our living room,but thankfuly we have the thick blackout blinds,but im sure they were never made for taking laser hits

Oh does anyone else have eye magic galvos?


djmatt

[djmatt]

Uh, no it's not.

CD is uncompressed- 16-bit 44.1 kHz stereo linear.

Most studios used 96 kHz 24-bit linear but since storage got so cheap an increasing number are moving to 192 kHz.

None of this has any bearing on the number of kilobits per second of MPEG layer 3 you're using, because neither CD nor studio use that. It's a lossy format and so it is unsuitable for studio use (the generation loss is perceptible even at 320 kbits/sec). CD predates MPEG, and in fact does not use any form of data compression.

Ah ok.

The biggest prob. I have is keeping the files under 15mb. most sites that I use dont let huge files upload.


djmatt

[Stuka]

I keep waiting for this Test Pattern to become engraved on my window shade. Has anyone left lasting impressions on their walls, curtains, doors, etc.? Cat

Well, I DID burn a pinhole in the wall in our office room with a laser, but that was one of those "doh" moments from letting the direct beam from 1 watt 532nm (green) shine on the wall!!

You shouldn't have to worry about scanned images & beam leaving a "lasting impression" anywhere, but with the powers he is running, a stationary, full-power concentrated beam could definitely scorth something!!

Not that Matt is likely to do that....

[allthatwhichis]

Well, I DID burn a pinhole in the wall in our office room with a laser, but that was one of those "doh" moments from letting the direct beam from 1 watt 532nm (green) shine on the wall!!

You shouldn't have to worry about scanned images & beam leaving a "lasting impression" anywhere, but with the powers he is running, a stationary, full-power concentrated beam could definitely scorth something!!

Not that Matt is likely to do that....

I must concur. I did a full power stationary beam on a closet door and it did start to smoke and did leave a burn mark... but scanning images and quick beams shouldn't burn anything.

[djmatt]

Well, I DID burn a pinhole in the wall in our office room with a laser, but that was one of those "doh" moments from letting the direct beam from 1 watt 532nm (green) shine on the wall!!

You shouldn't have to worry about scanned images & beam leaving a "lasting impression" anywhere, but with the powers he is running, a stationary, full-power concentrated beam could definitely scorth something!!

Not that Matt is likely to do that....

Haha!! See thats what Im worried about, the walls in our living room are not white, but a light brown But no holes....yet..!! I try to keep any single beams on the brick fireplace,Its bright but I know it wont burn!!

djmatt

[djmatt]

I must concur. I did a full power stationary beam on a closet door and it did start to smoke and did leave a burn mark... but scanning images and quick beams shouldn't burn anything.

Well I did burn a spot on my desk, but that was from this crazy laser pointer.. (250mw)

I wonder,what is the power of the beam when its scanning? Ive heard anywere from 2mw-8mw. I ve never understood that..

djmatt