Guys,
Having a debate with Dave at the moment as to what is a better overall solution for large/outdoor/overhead beamshows...
Would be interested to get some opinons from people who have experience using either cubrs or laserscopes (or both).
Here are the plusses/minuses of each as I see them:
Laserscope Plusses:
Big pulsed power -40W plus
Decent CW power (if you find a good laser) - can someone clarify what kinds of CW powers are realistically attainable ? I'm hearing anything from 2W to 20W.. but whats realistic
Laserscope Minusses:
Big fuckoff heavy washing machine enclosure
Lots of work to convert to something approaching portable
Only Green
Air Cooleds are still water cooled - and need to watch out for ambient temperature
Can blow chunks off the KTP if not careful
A lot to align (hence a lot to go wrong) <- somebody want to clarify this for me ?
need 40amp 240VAC socket
....
CuBr Plusses:
Green/Gold output
Less work required to make a portable laser projector
Aircooled
less power draw than laserscope
CuBr just wants to lase, so not a lot to go wrong in terms of alignment <-somebody care to clarify this for me, again ?
CuBr Minusses:
Not as powerful
needs a warm up and cool down
have to replace tubes every xxx hours
no CW output
---