But it's not a mono-chromatic, spacially-coherent beam. Thus it will not be focused to a diffraction-limited spot on the back of your retina, and it won't reach power densities of hundreds of thousands of watts. The beam from a laser will.
Remember: You can focus a 500 mw beam from a laser down to a microscopic point using just a tiny lens and burn wood with the beam, but try the same trick with a 2 inch diameter magnifying glass using the sun as a light source and you'll be hard pressed to smoke anything. Why? Because the sun is not mono-chromatic. The spot the magnifying glass makes is HUGE compared to the microscopic spot from a focused laser beam.
Agreed. They're damn bright. But it's not the raw power that's important. It's the power density (or irradiance, if you will) at the retina that counts. Broad-spectrum light does not focus well. But mono-chromatic light focuses *very* well.I don't know if anyone ever calculated the power density for a 2kW or even 5kW HMI profile theatre spot, but the beams on those are pretty damn narrow and people stare into those all the time.
You can do more damage to your eyes with a 1 watt laser than you could with a 5000 watt light bulb, simply because the lens in your eye will concentrate that 1 watt laser down to a diffraction-limited spot, increasing the power density tremendously. (We're talking 7 to 9 orders of magnitude here, even though the human eye is far from being a perfect lens.) You can't do that with the broad-spectrum light you get from a light bulb.
Adam