Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 53

Thread: ILDA specs

  1. #41
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Akron, Ohio USA
    Posts
    2,197

    Default

    Yes. That's true. Those little capacitors in series with the outputs of the DAC channels can eliminate the issues of what state the DAC is in at any given time. But it's consistent. It is a knowable situation that can be managed. And there are many different devices to choose from.
    Creator of LaserBoy!
    LaserBoy is free and runs in Windows, MacOS and Linux (including Raspberry Pi!).
    Download LaserBoy!
    YouTube Tutorials
    Ask me about my LaserBoy Correction Amp Kit for sale!
    All software has a learning curve usually proportional to its capabilities and unique features. Pointing with a mouse is in no way easier than tapping a key.

  2. #42
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Charleston, SC
    Posts
    2,147,489,446

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JohnYayas View Post
    If soundcard DACs would send 0V to all channels when nothing is sent to them then I think they would be as safe as anything.
    Sounds like the first step in engineering a dedicated laser show controller. Well, and removing the DC-filtering caps, and adding the correction amp, and so on...

    Also, I should point out that there have been commercial laser show controllers (old school) that were based on sound card designs, but they were heavily modified to add the sort of safety precautions we're discussing here. And yes, those modifications would be pointless if the card were just driving someone's home speakers.

    It's a shame and something that the soundcard manufacturers could easily fix but I don't think they expect them to be used in this manner.
    In fairness, the laser light show industry is tiny compared to the general market for sound cards, so I can't see why they would bother. Sure, it's an important feature for a laser controller, because you want it to fail in a safe state, but it's certainly not required for any of the more common uses for a sound card, so why spend the money adding a feature that would be useless to most of your market?

    Adam

  3. #43
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    2,292

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by buffo View Post
    Sounds like the first step in engineering a dedicated laser show controller. Well, and removing the DC-filtering caps, and adding the correction amp, and so on...

    Also, I should point out that there have been commercial laser show controllers (old school) that were based on sound card designs, but they were heavily modified to add the sort of safety precautions we're discussing here. And yes, those modifications would be pointless if the card were just driving someone's home speakers.



    In fairness, the laser light show industry is tiny compared to the general market for sound cards, so I can't see why they would bother. Sure, it's an important feature for a laser controller, because you want it to fail in a safe state, but it's certainly not required for any of the more common uses for a sound card, so why spend the money adding a feature that would be useless to most of your market?

    Adam
    Well, of course, those are good points. I wasn't claiming that soundcard DAC manufacturers should make a change for laser show use, I'm just saying that it is a shame that they aren't already sending them to 0V as a general practice, because then all would be fine. The firmware change to do that would be cost nothing (when factored into the life of the product). In actuality, the filter caps will cause the output to be 0V when there is no signal so they already ARE paying to do that with every unit. It's just that the caps get removed when modding them.

    The real shame is that laser controller DACs are so expensive and every one of them has their own oddball API. I can't wait for IDN to pick up and end this nonsense.

  4. #44
    swamidog's Avatar
    swamidog is online now Jr. Woodchuckington Janitor III, Esq.
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    santa fe, nm
    Posts
    1,545,752

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JohnYayas View Post

    The real shame is that laser controller DACs are so expensive and every one of them has their own oddball API. I can't wait for IDN to pick up and end this nonsense.
    We used IDN at the 2018 ILDA conference in Montreal. No db25's running to lasers. The ability to dynamically route groups of dacs to groups of projectors without having to do any cable swapping made switching disparate laser sources quick and seamless. It was great, but I would love to see more vendors supporting it natively. Seeing a table full of network dacs plugged into IDN stagemates and then into another network was silly.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_9372.JPG 
Views:	2 
Size:	3.40 MB 
ID:	54811
    suppose you're thinkin' about a plate o' shrimp. Suddenly someone'll say, like, plate, or shrimp, or plate o' shrimp out of the blue, no explanation. No point in lookin' for one, either. It's all part of a cosmic unconciousness.

  5. #45
    mixedgas's Avatar
    mixedgas is offline Creaky Old Award Winning Bastard Technologist
    Infinitus Excellentia Ion Laser Dominatus
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    A lab with some dripping water on the floor.
    Posts
    9,890

    Default

    If you want my IDN Modules, You can peel them from from my cold dead hands.
    Love that hardware.

    Steve
    Qui habet Christos, habet Vitam!
    I should have rented the space under my name for advertising.
    When I still could have...

  6. #46
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Fort Mill, SC USA
    Posts
    1,507

    Default

    The ability to reroute IDN signals as well as carry DMX signals is pretty cool. I still have some hesitations at the moment though. As I said at ILDA, I think its fine to integrate IDN directly into DACs as long as the receiving Stagemate in the projector can run alongside a legacy ILDA input. (I currently don't want to put DACs directly in my projectors as I am currently required to reroute signals between projectors externally due to software limitations.)

    In addition, Stagemates also need to come WAY down in price as the transmitter and the receiver are currently 350 Euros and 300 Euros respectively. Obviously the cost is lower if you integrate IDN into the DACs themselves and then that DAC into the projector directly. I'm sure there are some advantages to the approach various DAC manufacturers have taken to run their signaling over Ethernet lines that may drive end-consumers to want to choose those alternate protocol(s). Personally, I'm a fan of both (good) standards and control flexibility.

    -David
    "Help, help, I'm being repressed!"

  7. #47
    swamidog's Avatar
    swamidog is online now Jr. Woodchuckington Janitor III, Esq.
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    santa fe, nm
    Posts
    1,545,752

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dkumpula View Post
    The ability to reroute IDN signals as well as carry DMX signals is pretty cool. I still have some hesitations at the moment though. As I said at ILDA, I think its fine to integrate IDN directly into DACs as long as the receiving Stagemate in the projector can run alongside a legacy ILDA input. (I currently don't want to put DACs directly in my projectors as I am currently required to reroute signals between projectors externally due to software limitations.)

    In addition, Stagemates also need to come WAY down in price as the transmitter and the receiver are currently 350 Euros and 300 Euros respectively. Obviously the cost is lower if you integrate IDN into the DACs themselves and then that DAC into the projector directly. I'm sure there are some advantages to the approach various DAC manufacturers have taken to run their signaling over Ethernet lines that may drive end-consumers to want to choose those alternate protocol(s). Personally, I'm a fan of both (good) standards and control flexibility.

    -David
    totally agreed. regardless of whatever dac is installed in a projector, i hate to see projectors that doesn't support an external ilda signal.

    hardware costs for stagements could be drastically reduced by integrating support into existing dacs.
    suppose you're thinkin' about a plate o' shrimp. Suddenly someone'll say, like, plate, or shrimp, or plate o' shrimp out of the blue, no explanation. No point in lookin' for one, either. It's all part of a cosmic unconciousness.

  8. #48
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    Karlsruhe, Germany
    Posts
    28

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dkumpula View Post
    The ability to reroute IDN signals as well as carry DMX signals is pretty cool. I still have some hesitations at the moment though. As I said at ILDA, I think its fine to integrate IDN directly into DACs as long as the receiving Stagemate in the projector can run alongside a legacy ILDA input. (I currently don't want to put DACs directly in my projectors as I am currently required to reroute signals between projectors externally due to software limitations.)

    In addition, Stagemates also need to come WAY down in price as the transmitter and the receiver are currently 350 Euros and 300 Euros respectively. Obviously the cost is lower if you integrate IDN into the DACs themselves and then that DAC into the projector directly. I'm sure there are some advantages to the approach various DAC manufacturers have taken to run their signaling over Ethernet lines that may drive end-consumers to want to choose those alternate protocol(s). Personally, I'm a fan of both (good) standards and control flexibility.

    -David
    Well - StageMate ISP _is_ the/a DAC and IDN is just a protocol. Any software system can just output IDN and there are some drivers/implementations already. That way you won't have to do the additional ADC/DAC conversion (this was always thought as a compatibility solution for older - and analog - systems, that can't send IDN).

    Best
    --Dirk

  9. #49
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    Karlsruhe, Germany
    Posts
    28

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by swamidog View Post
    totally agreed. regardless of whatever dac is installed in a projector, i hate to see projectors that doesn't support an external ilda signal.

    hardware costs for stagements could be drastically reduced by integrating support into existing dacs.
    Jep - even better would be existing DACs could implement IDN...

  10. #50
    swamidog's Avatar
    swamidog is online now Jr. Woodchuckington Janitor III, Esq.
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    santa fe, nm
    Posts
    1,545,752

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DexLogic View Post
    Jep - even better would be existing DACs could implement IDN...
    yes.. that's what i was trying to say.
    suppose you're thinkin' about a plate o' shrimp. Suddenly someone'll say, like, plate, or shrimp, or plate o' shrimp out of the blue, no explanation. No point in lookin' for one, either. It's all part of a cosmic unconciousness.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •