Page 7 of 12 FirstFirst ... 34567891011 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 118

Thread: Modulation efficiency

  1. #61
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Native Floridian
    Posts
    3,133

    Default

    Optical feedback is a straightforward and fairly simple solution, making it the ideal choice.
    I wish I could say this was true! Then it would be somewhat easy to fix with an optical feedback loop. Take a look at the attached photo, between the two black lines is where the problem is. An optical feedback look just isn't going to be able to compensate for that, no matter how hard the feedback circuit is trying to correct, it just isn't going to be able to fix it. Unless you set the top end of the feedback loop to the lowest part of the valley (between the two lines in the pic), you'll still have image problems. So in this case, lets says it's a 100mW blue laser, the bottom of the valley is probably around 15% of total output. So with a feedback loop, I can make a 100mW blue laser absolutely stable with a max output of 15mW. All lasers will be different, this one just happens to be this low, however it falls pretty close in line with some of the other scope traces I've seen for blue lasers.

    Which really brings us back to AOM's, that might be the best solution, at the moment, to compensate. Or a combination of feedback loop (to make CW laser stable) and AOM.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails blue.JPG  


  2. #62
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,622

    Default

    You're right. As I said before, I firmly believe that 100% stability from any DPSS while under direct modulation is impossible regardless of what you might do to achieve it. Optical feedback would only offer some improvement.

    Unless you set the top end of the feedback loop to the lowest part of the valley (between the two lines in the pic), you'll still have image problems.
    That's precisely what I suggested in post #48, and that is the only way it would work.

  3. #63
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Native Floridian
    Posts
    3,133

    Default

    Other than the first small oscillation, it looks like your 532 is achieving full output even on the short pulse...what is the timescale/div?
    I don't recall, I'll take a look at the scope when I return and see what it was set for.

    So anyone have a stash of AOM's laying around?! I gave my last one away years ago. Didn't think I'd need them with solid state stuff.

  4. #64
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,622

    Default

    I meant to add that I like the idea of using optical feedback along with an AOM. That would yield the very highest stability. Those lucky individuals that own projectors that utilize Coherent Verdis (and most other extremely high-end systems) are already there. The Verdi has optical feedback (among many other stability features) and cannot be directly modulated. That means either AOM or galvo blanking.
    Last edited by ElektroFreak; 12-01-2009 at 11:26.

  5. #65
    clandestiny's Avatar
    clandestiny is offline Eleventy-Billion Watt Ar/Kr >:)
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    somewhere between orlando and san antonio
    Posts
    557

    Default

    Excellent post mr tocket
    go big or go home

  6. #66
    clandestiny's Avatar
    clandestiny is offline Eleventy-Billion Watt Ar/Kr >:)
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    somewhere between orlando and san antonio
    Posts
    557

    Default

    Since Steve mentioned this- I like the Adat through the Layla arrAngement

    What would be the playback platform once digitized? Mutitrack audio program or laserboy?
    go big or go home

  7. #67
    mixedgas's Avatar
    mixedgas is offline Creaky Old Award Winning Bastard Technologist
    Infinitus Excellentia Ion Laser Dominatus
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    A lab with some dripping water on the floor.
    Posts
    10,016

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by clandestiny View Post
    Since Steve mentioned this- I like the Adat through the Layla arrAngement

    What would be the playback platform once digitized? Mutitrack audio program or laserboy?
    for viewing the waveforms,

    Laserboy has a neat waveform scope mode once you have made the wav files with another program, ie laserboy doesnt talk to direct to ECHO's stuff. Laserboy probably gets you a better sample by sample viewing, but how fast you can index in it I dont know. If James will take my phone call, I'll ask.

    Multitrack audio editor is probably easier.

    Echo's stuff just "plugs in" to most audio programs as 4 crosslinked stereo soundcards, at least when I've seen it used.

    I'm gonna be using Echo Gina in a few days, I'll let you know what I learn.

    If I understand correctly, with Ms Gina you can use the ADATs dacs for playback as well. Lightpipe is cool.

    Steve
    Qui habet Christos, habet Vitam!
    I should have rented the space under my name for advertising.
    When I still could have...

  8. #68
    clandestiny's Avatar
    clandestiny is offline Eleventy-Billion Watt Ar/Kr >:)
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    somewhere between orlando and san antonio
    Posts
    557

    Talking

    Thanks Steve, I have a layla right here, I'm going to check it out-
    go big or go home

  9. #69
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    nerdtown, USA
    Posts
    1,165

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DZ View Post
    I wish I could say this was true! Then it would be somewhat easy to fix with an optical feedback loop. Take a look at the attached photo, between the two black lines is where the problem is.
    Hmmm.

    Could you scope the diode drive current? I am wondering if there might be some issue with the drivers on these Chinese DPSSes. That initial spike seems awfully high...

  10. #70
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    983

    Default

    Red diodes seem to work fine, green DPSS aren't that bad, and Blue DPSS can be replaced with 445nm diodes. The latter hasn't been brought up here yet so I'm throwing it in. There is a thread where the 445nm diodes are proven to be a cost effective replacement for higher power levels. The need for an extra AOM, cost and space wise should make the 445nm diodes even more attractive.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •