Page 15 of 23 FirstFirst ... 5111213141516171819 ... LastLast
Results 141 to 150 of 230

Thread: Open Source/Freeware Budget USB DAC

  1. #141
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    2,342

    Default

    Ok, glad we've settled on some good raw hardware. Here is something to consider for the output amps:

    The official ILDA spec, at least what I read from the excellent laserFX site, specifies that the X and Y signals are delivered with a pair of differential outputs each limited to a +/-5V swing with respect to the ground pin for a total peak differential voltage of +/- 10V. Similarly, the color and intensity signals are to be differential 0 to 2.5V and 0 to -2.5V outputs with respect to the ground pin for a 0 to 5V differential swing. However. Almost every analog laser uses single ended 5V (with respect to ground) input, but the spec only allows for max 2.5V with respect to ground.

    I propose that for the X and Y outputs, we stick to the standard and just have plain-jane output amps with +/- 5V max (with respect to the gnd pin) signals on the outputs, however with the color and intensity lines, we make use of an active balanced transmitter setup. The active balanced transmitter setup will produce a 5V swing using +/- 2.5V differential lines when connected to a projector that accepts differential inputs, however when connected to a projector that grounds the -R,G,B, or I signals, the active balanced transmitter will develop the 5V differential on the +R,G,B,or I lines. The result will maintain noise cancellation for projectors that make use of it, while at the same time work well with projectors that don't make use of it.

    An example of an active balanced transmitter for audio is on this page:
    http://sound.westhost.com/project87.htm
    and here
    http://sound.westhost.com/balance.htm
    Last edited by drlava; 05-14-2009 at 20:56.

  2. #142
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    nerdtown, USA
    Posts
    1,165

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by drlava View Post
    [balanced output drivers]
    I dig it, let's do that.

    What's good for schematic capture these days? Bonus points if I can run it on a Mac. I'd use Orcad but I'm guessing most people don't have a license for that...

  3. #143
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    East Coast of Southern Virginia
    Posts
    554

    Default

    Eagle is big in the DIY world. See Linux-Laser project for a nice differential output setup I think. I think it uses TL084's which are inexpensive and work well.

  4. #144
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    1,009

    Default

    Jup, you forgot a few things in you list mixedgas ...

    • DC-DC converter
    • Dacs that can output positive / negative (I don't know which one you settled one but you may want to check that)
    • Alternatively, you could use an extra opamp with an offset + gain of 2
    • And then you'd just need two more opamps to form the differential output (inverting + non-inverting amps with gain of (-)1)

  5. #145
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Vezon, Belgium
    Posts
    1,017

    Default

    may I point out this controller?

    http://www.maxim-ic.com/quick_view2.cfm/qv_pk/3609

    this is a LQFP package, but its performances are TOP!

    has ethernet with everything needed to do UDP streaming, everything for math processing, 32bit, 80Mhz and the list goes...

    the most interesting is that it is available as free samples from maxim

    but most of the deal is that it is fully JAVA programmable, with a java virtual machine in it when you receive it, you just have to plug it on your network to start programming

    again, there's a serial port which could easily take care of several Mbps for FTDI use

  6. #146
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Ukraine
    Posts
    128

    Default

    to Steve about components:

    If you will use DAC without internal reference voltage - you should use separate chip for it (REF195 for example)

    Next...
    Your device will work by USB. So it can't be OEM. It means that you should spent additional money for:
    - enclosure;
    - mechanics work for enclosure (cutting windows for connectors and LED );
    - printing.

    And..
    It will powered from USB?
    If no - add power supply cost...

    Ihor

  7. #147
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    nerdtown, USA
    Posts
    1,165

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by shrad View Post
    may I point out this controller?

    http://www.maxim-ic.com/quick_view2.cfm/qv_pk/3609

    this is a LQFP package, but its performances are TOP!
    And you can't get it for love nor money. Maxim's lead times are legendary; plus, Atmel have been good to me in the past. It's either Atmel or ARM for me, thanks. I've played the my-product-is-now-suddenly-dead architecture game one time too many.

    Quote Originally Posted by riyalasers View Post
    to Steve about components:

    If you will use DAC without internal reference voltage - you should use separate chip for it (REF195 for example)
    A three-pin regulator (which we need anyway) has worked very well for me in this application.

    Your device will work by USB. So it can't be OEM.
    That makes no sense whatsoever.

  8. #148
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Vezon, Belgium
    Posts
    1,017

    Default

    the problem with 3-pins regulators (at least 78 and 79 series) are not so accurate, temperature dependant, tend to oscillate, and many more issues

    zener voltage references are far better, stable and so, but still temperature dependant

    there are voltage references based on zener but with thermal compensation for some cents, I think, which would avoid to have to adjust each DAC voltages by hand to compensate for differences

  9. #149
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    nerdtown, USA
    Posts
    1,165

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by shrad View Post
    the problem with 3-pins regulators (at least 78 and 79 series) are not so accurate, temperature dependant, tend to oscillate, and many more issues
    Modern three-pin LDO regulators contain precision bandgap references which are very accurate and stable.

  10. #150
    mixedgas's Avatar
    mixedgas is offline Creaky Old Award Winning Bastard Technologist
    Infinitus Excellentia Ion Laser Dominatus
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    A lab with some dripping water on the floor.
    Posts
    10,051

    Default

    [QUOTE=heroic;96746]And you can't get it for love nor money. Maxim's lead times are legendary; plus, Atmel have been good to me in the past.

    Yeah, I'm trying to source 4-6 pieces of a Max part that had a lifetime of four years and cost 1.50$ when new. I just got quoted 35.00$ each from a chip broker, minimum order 10. He bought the entire remaining lot at the "end of life" announcement, and would have 40 left in stock if I ordered the 10.
    Most chip makers idea of a EOl quanity is 40,000.

    Maxim is FABLESS on a lot of their parts, and when a fab changes technology Maxim does not redesign. But they make some of the most groovie unobtainium in the world.

    Yet AD and National still source stuff that is pushing 40 years of production.

    Of course National's big mistake was discontinuing the LM3909 and they learned from the backlash over that.

    Steve
    Qui habet Christos, habet Vitam!
    I should have rented the space under my name for advertising.
    When I still could have...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •